Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not at all what it seems (Score 2) 168

lot of financial issues in Canada and it isn't anything new
[Citation Needed]

http://www.cbc.ca/news2/intera...
Canadians had no financial issues until Harper took power. We were on track to pay off the national debt.

Libraries are hardly used to begin
[Citation Needed]

cost a significant amount to create and maintain
[Citation Needed]

They are expensive, and a huge tax burden
[Citation Needed]

Everything in those libraries are turned into ebooks
[Citation definitely Needed]

Comment Re:This is frightening (Score 1) 312

I think the strongest candidates for the Great Filter are Life originating, Multi-cellular Life evolving, Intelligent Life evolving, and the existence of an environment that remains continually-habitable for 4 billion years.

For all of the filtration events in the past that weren't serious, I can't see any evidence that these four aren't doozies. I certainly lean towards the filtration of the past explaining our solitude, rather than a filtration in the future.

Comment Re:What else wouldn't we have without fracking? (Score 2) 236

So essentially we've gotten nothing from fracking
Did you even RTFA^HS^HHeadline? "We" have leverage over Iran. Which is generally recognized as a good thing (feel free to argue).

Whether or not it's worth the vast environmental damage is for you to decide, but don't display your stupidity by claiming there are absolutely no upsides.

Comment Re:We're All Guily (Score 1) 1160

So if a kidnapper releases his victim after a few years, all's good?

I'm not taking issue with the anti-death-penalty stance, I'm taking issue with the simplistic "if we we do it,how are we better?" argument. There are clear differences between killing a mugging victim/hit target/cheating wife, and killing a killer. Arguing they're the same is only going to convince your opponents that you're dumb enough to believe it, and drive them further from your point of view.

Comment Re:Senator Obama on raising the debt ceiling (Score 1) 305

This works only so long as our money and credit last. If it doesn't, then what?

As bad as you think things are, is it worth destroying the credibility of the US when it says "I will pay you for your services"? D you want to turn America into a deadbeat state? Or is the solution not to renege on your promises, but to elect people who do not make them in the first place?

Comment Re:Senator Obama on raising the debt ceiling (Score 0) 305

I only wish President Obama still believed what he did as Senator.

Not me - I'm glad he came to his senses. There are two ways to deal with a high deficit. You can stop promising other people money, or you can start reneging on the promises you already made.

The debt ceiling vote is about keeping promises already made, and it's beyond stupid that a vote is even required. You made those promises. Keep them, or create a new government that will.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...