Are you incapable of answering even a simple "yes" or "no" question?

I'll repeat. Do you want to see me in person?

You wanna see me in person?

I'm not sure I'd insult a cockroach with that comparison... or any other member of the flora and fauna. Even pond scum serves a useful purpose. That asshole? Not so much.

Shouldn't be hard, he's probably trying to track you down in the Real World for some good old fashioned social media shaming -- also known as the 2 minutes of hate.

He's as big of a brownshirt as any of them. Witness his non-stop harassment of conservatives on slashdot.

Fascist Democrats act like Fascist Democrats.

They're just following Saul Alinsky's Rules.

Their licenses probably say that the government gets to do what they want, and shut up.

.. and here's a source that says there's a cover-up, that ISIS is indeed there. Link

Are they there? Beats me. If they are, if they're smart, they'll stay in Mexico. We Texans have lots of guns, after all.

The handler doesn't even need to signal the dog. The handler might just want to search the car, and the dog picks up on unconscious cues, and alerts.

It's unreasonable search.

Say you get pulled over for a busted tail light, and the cop notices a corpse in your back seat. That's OK.

Say he says 'Ho-lee sheeeit, smells like dead body. Pop your trunk open.' And hey, there's a dead body in the trunk. That's OK.

But he can't say 'I done pulled you over for a busted tail light, but I'mma search your car for a corpse, even though I have no reason to believe there's any corpses.' Not reasonable.

Now, this guy gets pulled over for lane swerve. Fine. Cop can sniff his breath, look for signs of intoxication. Cop can eyeball the seats through the window, the ashtray, looking for booze bottles, roaches, whatever. But he can't say 'I have no real reason to, but I'm turning this traffic stop into a drug stop, *but first I need to call in extra equipment.* That's unreasonable.

If he'd happened to have had the dog with him, and decided to have the dog give the car a once-over, fine. Although I question the validity of dog searches; we know that animals can pick up on clues to what their owners want. See the Clever Hans phenomena. If the cop wants to search the car, the dog might just pick up on that and alert.

And one more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K...

It is a well-documented fact that he absolutely loved women. A lot.

Whether they wanted him to or not.

Nah, the Jebster is her choice. The Bushes and Clintons are very close, and ever since the rumored "McCain / Lieberman UNITY YOU GUYS" ticket rumors I think Hitlary wants to emulate that.

Can you imagine the scale of the fawning press coverage of Hitlary, an open lesbian, and Jeb Bush on the same ticket?

The media would slobber over that even more than the NY Times slobbered over Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin in the 1930's.

In other words, A LOT.

Also: Her running mate will be....

Jeb Bush.

One People. One Party. One Leader.

I don't see any sexual insults, but I do see a slang term used by the 'Tea Party,' for a while, to describe themselves.