What is missing is the word 'design'. You may comment why you made a design (or write a paper on it). You may understand the design by reading the code. If you don't it is either too complex (because there is a possibility to write the same functionality with the same complexity with easier-to-read code) or you need to explain the design for it.

They might have to do with the large usage of anti biotics.

What about the case where all java classes are named the same (but in different packages)? I think refactoring would help quality.

Robots of course. I welcome our new Robot overlord!

And here we have Schrodingers cat dilemma. If this comment is true, it has some worth to it. If it is false, it means that many Slashdotters' time is wasted over nothing. Maybe even surpassing the money-limit damage you just mentioned. The things a posting may trigger (pun intended).

In Soviet Russia you are the Man From Middle

At our place, being PM does not mean being my boss. As PM you get to write specs and acceptance criteria. My boss is someone else. The process is managed by someone else again, the scrum master. It works nice.

You have to define a problem before you can state that you need math to solve it. Some believe that a large cluster of simulated neurons is the way to go (but I have yet to see proof it would bring A.I. and is the only/most efficient way to bring A.I. ).

You can only write Mathematica in Emacs, obviously. Everything runs om Emacs.

The basics ;-).

Although I don't agree with you... Spamfiltering means you need data (from a large number of users). Not having free accounts means much less abuse data. Their service will not be as good.

There are examples of cable that are strong enough in long stretches (2.5km), light (~10kg) and have a high break strength. Such as used in a glider winch. I guess there are extra demands to an elevator.

I almost read s/Norton/Snowden/ and then I read after the comma.