Comment Re:Regulation for Taxation (Score 3, Insightful) 193
= = = Massachusetts is particularly diligent to make sure they get a cut when cash changes hands.= = =
There's a term for that. Wait a minute,
sPH
= = = Massachusetts is particularly diligent to make sure they get a cut when cash changes hands.= = =
There's a term for that. Wait a minute,
sPH
Re the Upton Sinclair quote: I'm pretty sure (don't have time to dig through the library at the moment) that earthquakes from well injection were known in California in the 1920s (when Sinclair had a small interest in the oil boom there, hence Oil! [later "There Will Be Blood"]).
sPh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_%28epithet%29
Use of the term has been a point of contention within the Republican Party. In 1984, when a delegate of the Republican platform committee asked unanimous consent to change a platform amendment to read the Democrat Party instead of Democratic Party, New York Representative Jack Kemp objected, saying that would be "an insult to our Democratic friends" and the committee dropped the proposal.[2] In 1996, the wording throughout the Republican party platform was changed from "Democratic Party" to "Democrat Party": Republican leaders "explained they wanted to make the subtle point that the Democratic Party had become elitist".[19] A proposal to use the term again in the August 2008 Republican Platform for similar reasons was voted down with leaders choosing to use "Democratic Party". "We probably should use what the actual name is," said Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, the panel's chairman. "At least in writing."
Yeah, Jack Kemp and Haley Barbour, flaming libruls both. Got it. Nice try though.
"Democrat Party" is a slur, originally developed by Jesse Helms and later picked up and expanded upon by Karl Rove, intended to take away from Democrats - that is, members of the Democratic Party, the right to choose their own name.
As Theon can tell you having an entity that is attempting to obtain dominance over you impose a name not of your choosing is not a good thing. Members of the Democratic Party have been pretty vigilant about this since George W. Bush started doing it regularly. Hard right wing radicals don't like to be called out on their attempts though for some weird reason.
sPh
What's a "Democrat Party"? Whig, Republican, Bull Moose, and Democratic are some major US political parties that come to mind but I don't recall a "Democrat Party" from the history textbooks.
sPh
= = = Women make less than men over their careers because they have babies, = = =
Last time I checked, the vast majority of people in the US who have babies are married. It takes two to have a baby, and care of the child is both parents' responsibility. So you're basically saying that men in the tech industry shirk their childrearing responsibilities too.
= = = Then men and women hit their 50s. Kids are out of the house and on their own. Men starting taking months at a time off for prostate cancer and heart surgery, while women are hitting their stride at work. And yet oddly the salaries and titles of the 50-something men are never reduced to match their lower productivity. What a meritocracy! = = =
Ouch.
Then men and women hit their 50s. Kids are out of the house and on their own. Men starting taking months at a time off for prostate cancer and heart surgery, while women are hitting their stride at work. And yet oddly the salaries and titles of the 50-something men are never reduced to match their lower productivity. What a meritocracy!
sPh
= = = And guess the primary cause of that.....
Prostate cancer? Heart bypass surgery? Snapped Achilles tendon?
sPh
AFAIK IANAL dual citizenships aren't legal(or maybe not legally recognized would be more correct?) in the US to begin with.
The US position on dual citizenships is generally to ignore them. So as far as the US government was concerned these kids would be solely American. They wouldn't get in trouble or anything.
while our son was born in Canada and I signed to forms to allow him to get a US passport. In hindsight I wish I had never done this.
If you were married at the time of your son's birth, then he was a US citizen regardless of what forms you did or did not fill out. There was nothing you could do about it. So don't feel too badly.
The dollar is not an especially strong currency.
While I agree with the gist of your posting, the dollar is in fact the strongest major currency in the world at the moment, with the possible exception of the Swiss franc.
US consular assistance is pretty worthless. They do the bare minimum and charge up the ass for everything else.
As a dual US-EU citizen, I never travel on my US passport or deal with the US overseas when I can help it, because it's a waste of time.
Also, as a EU citizen, I have the benefit of recourse to consular services from any other EU nation if mine isn't available.
The US isn't the only country that evacuates its citizens, but as far as I know it's the only one that will send you a bill afterwards. I'd much rather be evacuated by the French, for example, who have a far stronger record in overseas citizen protection.
In fact, the USA is the only significant country that taxes based on citizenship rather than residence.
Pretty much no other country taxes its citizens when they are living outside that country in the long term. Only the USA does.
For this reason American dual citizens and expats are at a serious disadvantage in the international job and investment market.
You can rant all you like, but the US can easily seize your assets by putting pressure on the foreign bank where you have them stored.
Any bank of any size will have international operations in the US which are much more valuable to them than you are.
US government threatens bank, bank caves. Every time.
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman