why are you using the 2010 cars per household with the 2001 person per household?

No why are you using the 2001 persons per household number, why aren't you using 2010 persons per household. Major mistake as it makes your numbers meaningless.

Why do you live an hour away from where you have to commute 5 days a week? that's just wasteful in every sense.

Hmm, my humor seems to only work on me.

I'll definitely agree with that, but if it hadn't been Apple it would have been somebody else. Mp3's were the future regardless of how hard the recording industry tried to kill it with DRM.

I did say some look fake.

Steve Jobs gave 50 million to Stanford Medical (granted they were treating his cancer) and an unsubstantiated amount to Bono's Aid's research charity (probably why you all got U2's album shoved onto your phones).

Digital music was well on it's way before apple produced the iPod. And let's not forget the LG Prada which came out almost a year before the iPhone, it was the first phone with a capacitive touchscreen and that form factor.

No, but it probably has a lot to do with what he is doing now.

and retarded not retard.

How about Apple's then.

We tried that with the Articles of Confederation. A weak federal government was found to be a failure.

Hell, it's been the weakness of every country that fought in WW2.

Damn my inablilty to type.
>And that in now way is proof
should be
And that is in no way proof.

>I would argue that the very existence of a "medallion" that costs more than the filing fee is evidence of collusion between the taxi authority and the taxi's

And that in now way is proof. The medallion system started in NYC due to public outcry. That is fact, not this fairy-tail taxi cartel.

It is also fact that Uber has zero respect for our laws, and that alone should warrant action.