That's a silly comparison, as you obviously offer the person (man or women) with more experience a higher wage.
But nurses make a good deal more then medics.
Or are you using the wrong word,
Medic = Paramedic (you know the guys in the ambulances)
Medic != Doctor
Why do you think nurses are lower down then medics?
and by medics I am guessing you are talking about paramedics.
>probably a rich idiot (we never hear about that)
What do you mean, She's got a Corvette, what looks to be a Mini Cooper, and a Jeep, and 3 homes (a Dream House in Malibu, a Beach House, and a Vacation House).
Please the girl is loaded.
Heck, I'll keep pressing the button even if they stop paying me.
The other guy said it nicer, but nice racist post you got going there.
I don't know maybe the 200 billion we gave in the 1996 Telecommunications Act.
Since you can't argue without insulting I have one for you Sir AssHat, Where do these groups qualify for 501(c)(3) status? They don't they should all be 501(c)(4), Same tax free status, they just want to hide their donor lists. Why was it so important to keep those lists hidden?
The IRS actually did not do anything wrong until they were shamed into letting the groups keep their 501(c)(3) status.
Well that's a bullshit statement, Since Not one of the groups (both right and left) actually qualify for 501(c)3 status. They should all be 501(c)4 which was created just for political groups. But no they wanted to abuse the rules and hide their donors. The big right wing hullabaloo was all a smokescreen to shame the IRS into doign the wrong thing.
If your complaining about a wrongdoing then don't defend the ones doing the wrong.
Then don't complain when things don't get fixed in your state.
And the main losers are the states and their residents since they lose out a a large part of their revenue and thus have to make it up in other ways. So the trade off is pay the sales and use tax or pay higher property and income taxes. It's not like the roads get fixed for free.
Both are software and a tablet is most definitely a computer.
>the courts found Apple Records to infringe on Apple Computer's mark
You have that backwards. It was Apple Corps (the Beatles) who sued. Apple Corp was never found to be the infringing party.