Funny how people give away that they are being deceitful when they do such things, but just assume that no-one will pick up on it (because everyone is stupid but me, I guess is the thinking).

Politics is overly fixated on personality in general. So while I'm not who you are replying to, I'd agree. The EFF are better than Wikileaks, because Assange.

Assange is obviously a narcissistic psychopath. He's in this for himself. Anyone in Wikileaks who thinks otherwise is a complete fool.

That you lump in Assange with Snowden illustrates neatly that you don't have a clue and can be safely ignored.

An authentic crackpot. Why are there never any self-aware ones? ;)

Bullet cluster. Galactic rotation rates. Gravitational lensing.

Funny concept of zero you have. Any other theories you don't like that you want us all to stop taking seriously?

Modified Newtownian theories are all dead in the water. They've been discredited. Enjoy wallowing in ignorance.

In other words, you don't like the idea, you reject it for emotional reasons, and you want everyone else to agree with your stupid, uneducated dumbass opinion. How about fuck off and come back with something solid..? Evidence for DM = Bullet cluster, galactic rotation rates, gravitional lensing. What have you got other than ignorant ranting? Not much I expect.

Now that you've posted it twice, you can probably give it a rest.

Wrong. The jaggy discrete quantum world and its forces are completely alien to GR. No-one denies this. Your statement is profoundly ignorant.

There's a high bar to demonstrate your competence, which is how is should be. We can't let idiots who know fuck all about the subject matter dominate the debate. Sorry.

Please post your alternative explanation for the bullet cluster, and for the rotation of stars in the outer reaches of galaxies. The OP asked a question/cracked a stupid joke so your third statement is nonsensical.

Fantastic, a lone genius who has seen behind the curtain and is laughing at all the ignorant graybeards. On Slashdot of all places. Who'd have thought a casually arrogant armchair blowhard would reside here of all places.

What keeps you from blowing the lid on all this? Worried they'll do a Galileo on you?

Well, you're homo sapiens; (or a very close approximation). You can't imagine any reason why we might prefer to keep the world and its climate/biosphere largely as it is now? None at all?

You may well have a point in general, but the Mail is a complete rag.

Perhaps they won't change their behaviour; but perhaps their behaviour will be noted and they'll go work in another industry with less responsibility to the public.