Comment Re:Which brings us to now (Score 1) 417
Well, you're homo sapiens; (or a very close approximation). You can't imagine any reason why we might prefer to keep the world and its climate/biosphere largely as it is now? None at all?
He dropped the taser next to him after shooting him in the back. He made no attempt to check on the guy's condition. He tried to frame/set up a guy lying dying on the ground, and you're defending him, well done you.
Thank goodness it was a white on black action or we would not have even heard about it.
Are you seriously suggesting that the real problem with police racism is the other way around? LOL.
Your motivated reasoning is painfully, painfully obvious. If you're trying to come across as reasonable (you aren't) you need to try harder.
Everyone has decided that the Standard model is mostly correct
So the religion of the standard model continues and the added apostle gets accepted into the religion.
The Standard Model has so far withstood most attempts to prove it wrong, so it is tentatively accepted. There was no 'decision'. It's obvious that you disagree with it for your own 'reasons' - but rather than attempt to criticise it with logic and evidence, you declare that it is a religion. LOL.
Basically, you aren't brave enough to argue honestly, and would rather smear shit around. The Standard Model might well give way to a different paradigm (it doesn't incorporate gravity for example), but if it does, it will be based on evidence and broad consensus. And you'll still be wrong.
wasted billions of dollars and need to build a better instrument.
It's perfectly clear you've made your mind up that that is the point; so why would anyone waste their time attempting to convince you otherwise? That time would be better spent educating someone who hasn't decided they already know everything worth knowing.
That and the fact the version numbers once they hit 2.0 went up by 1 whole number every couple months always showed they were after fame more than openness.
You don't think their anonymity is relevant to this comment? They're famous are they?
Oh, wait - you're not one of those global warming priests are you?
I expect you're happy with computer modelling for many things, but happily make a motivated-reasoning-oriented exception with something you've got emotions invested in. And also, of course, pretend that computer modelling is what it's all about.
This file will self-destruct in five minutes.
