That makes perfect sense now. Thanks ;)

Religion would fail at most of its goals if it didn't have the divisive/chosen-people/"us vs them" angle. That's what makes it fun, we can castigate out-groups and do whatever the fuck we like, including but not limited to rape and murder, and as an added bonus we get to please 'god' into the bargain. Religion excels at what it is for - enabling cunts to do cuntish things.

Your point would be true genius were it not for the fact that bullies, typically, are not high-quality examples of humanity. They are typically socially repressed mental and emotional retards (much like yourself). The only reason I'm being so rude is I know you'd appreciate my efforts to socially hygienize some /. comments.

Joking aside; I wish I could say nice troll, but I can't because it's too obvious.

It doesn't appear to have done you any good.

The person you're replying to didn't say anything in support of corporal punishment.

I don't have kids, but from what I've seen, consistency is incredibly important. They are always trying to test boundaries. If they see inconsistency they will know it's worth pushing to see what the outcome will be next time.

Yes but she's coming to the media and saying: "those phones, that everyone has, they're BAD and they're KILLING CHILDREN" - boom, they will love her, they will post her shit. It doesn't matter if it's true, it matters that it's a compelling narrative.

I've read these sentences a few times, can't get them to make any sense at all.

She wants to be part of a narrative that spreads. e.g. Phones were good, but now they're bad, all these bad things happen because of phones.

In short, with some people I believe that the details of the story are irrelevant, the direction of the story is irrelevant. Negative stories are good because FUD spreads with ease.

Well, they have to die in order for there to be a problem in the first place, yes. I realise it can seem complicated but stick with me, you'll get there in the end.

I like the "SJW" term, it is used by dickheads, who conveniently identify themselves as dickheads by using this term. Saves time.

The description says that a remote hacker can get admin credentials. Didn't read TFA. What I don't understand is why a router like that has any kind of management enabled on the WAN side by default at all.

Well; the drugs in the lethal injection are scarce now so they would probably prefer to only execute the guilty in instances where the injection is to be used.

Best lead by example and euthanise yourself; it would be awful to be outed as a hypocrite. ;)

I believe you might be thinking of Westinghouse/Edison. Edison had an elephant (Topsy) executed with AC to show everyone how 'dangerous' AC was. He tried to have the process become known as 'being Westinghoused'. Edison was a complete dick.