That's the real problem. If they did it like google, essentially allowing payment to be featured and marked as such, it wouldn't be a problem taking the money from the people reviewed. Manipulating the reviews though sucks, especially since it's still the best way to find something nearby quickly when somewhere new .
How was yelp beaten ?
I'm unlikely to find this restaurant now , and we have no evidence yelp is going to stop calling them .
Oilcan completetly see how having unfettered access for the security is better than a locked door .
Casinos don't have locking doors either
Double barrel locks are a higher risk in killing you in a fire than the added security of not being able to break a window and reach in to unlock .
Isn't galaxy nexus 2-3 years old ?
1 year
2 year nexus 4
3 year galaxy nexus ?
Not as good as apple for sure
We had one of them where I work (in the late 90s, maybe into early 2000s). One of our locations didn't have access to DSL, and cable didn't exist yet. Eventually, when the internet was more important, they got ISDN there, and then a T-1 when they got cheap (when factoring in all of the phone lines included). I actually think the location closed just before cable was available.
I agree, I wasn't critisizing, I was stating my honest memory of the primary.
Obama whooped people up, but Hilary was more liberal (note I voted Obama, we have a decent recent history with moderate dems).
That's in 1860 though, after importation was banned if I am not mistaken.
In the Caribbean life expectancy was far lower.
I thought Obama was running more middle of the line than Hillary, wasn't she for single payer since the 90s?
My memory is hazy, but Obama seemed to run moderate with a liberal fervor (sort of like how second Bush ran super conservative, but with a moderate fervor). What policies was Obama running on that were more progressive than Hillary (or really even McCain?).
Do chromebooks have modems? Does Chrome OS even support dial-up?
I thought their ad was pretty compelling, surprised it flopped.
Now that on think of it, I probably saw the ad on Hulu, so maybe nobody saw it but me.
But they maid the announcement it was coming in mid june, so I think they just rushed the planned release while still testing many devices.
And this is why
Thanks, this should help anyone that thinks 4chan is absolute scum see that when presented with actual vileness, they error on the side of decency (they still surpass what I want to see, but I'm a prude, and at least they protect those without full personhood).
I was not, and did not mean to imply it was their policy.
I was trying to say that the legal risk was not there, not speak to what the policies were.
The law is (from wikipedia, I'm too lazy to read the actual statutes right now):
The PROTECT Act also amended 18 U.S.C. 2252A, which was part of the original CPPA. The amendment added paragraph (a)(3), which criminalizes knowingly advertising or distributing "an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct". The law draws a distinction between obscene depiction of any minor, and mere depiction of an actual minor.
As long as it's not sexually explicit it's legal, though also:
In 1994, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that the federal statute contains no requirement that genitals be visible or discernible. The court ruled that non-nude visual depictions can qualify as lascivious exhibitions and that this construction does not render the statute unconstitutionally overbroad.[19]
So genitals are a help in determining, but are not a requirement, and if it's not sexually explicit, it's not pornography, and therefore not child pornagraphy. I have not looked at the pictures in question, because, I have better things to do.
I had one go off on a pothole, a bad one, but not one bad enough to pop a tire.
Also, it's wasted space, which I assume is at a premium on a tank.
With your bare hands?!?
