It s possible that those ex-cops are the ones that are pissed off at the bad cops for making them look bad.The more people you report it to the higher chance something will happen. It is very easy to do nothing and then gripe about the incident happening. If you report it and nothing happens at least you tried.

There is one sure way of guaranteeing that internal affairs will never investigate an incident; Don't report it.

Did you report it to any of the following; local police board, state police board, prosecutor in the case? The prosecutor would be your best bet as they usually get pissed off when their witnesses are messed with. The prosecutor could charge the officers with witness tampering. Did you politely ask for the case number so you could refer to the incident later?

So bypass the hard parts by soldering into the circuits and then say the device is insecure. We have no idea how many layers they bypassed. This is like entering the bank, shutting off the alarm with the code, opening the vault door with the combination, drilling a few safety deposit boxes and then saying safety deposit boxes in banks are insecure.

If you need physical access to the dongle it is not a true exploit of the dongle.

There is a light on the current Glass but it is software controlled and can be disabled.

A visible physical shutter that can be moved over the camera lens to prove that one is not recording video. I realize that it does not deal with people not near enough to see the shutter but at least it will put the people at the table at ease. This is not a perfect solution but it might help.

The only difference is that a pill is passive while this method actively embeds objects into the stomach wall.

No, the motors were swallowed by the mouse where they interacted with the acid in the stomach and began to move. Some of them eventually encountered the stomach lining where they embedded themselves. There was no payload release.

These are motors with a payload not microbots.
Here are a few issues;
They only work in an acid environment.
This method could not be uses in blood supply as it produces gas which could cause an embolism.
They have no way of discerning where they are. To deliver a drug to a specific point that is necessary.
This may be a step to delivering drugs to the stomach or intestines but not really applicable to the rest of the body.

Unguided delivery device.

Take a look at this.

That can already be done with FLIR. Which is actually better because the radar only detects movement. It would not detect someone sitting, watching tv and not moving.

The difference between sales and marketing advertising is that sales advertising is designed to sell an existing product while marketing advertising is designed to get the product in the mind of people who might eventually purchase it. In marketing the product need on yet exist. This is a marketing ad. It is the same as all the ads for movies that are yet to be released.

From the article.

SO only direct connect has been proven.

Remote access has only been shown by similar systems.

Call me when you can actually show a remote exploit through the dongle.

The second you disable another drone in flight you become liable for any damage it does coming down. If someone gets injured or something gets damaged the owner of the attack drone in on the hook. It could also be considered destruction of private property if what the drone was doing was legal.

The only thing I added to the conversation was "winding through mountains" which also adds to the cost of rail transport. Since the subject of the discussion is the cost of rail transport I do no see that as changing the goal posts. You are the one that can not seem to handle additional information. What supported facts have you brought to the discussion? As far as I can see, none.

You can call me a liar all you want. It does not detract from the fact that I have independent information that supports my position while you have opinions based on living next to a rail line. Would living next to CERN make one be qualified to make unsupported claims about particle physics. Even your one claim about not clearing snow is proven to be false. The rest of your claims being "no it isn't".

Again, you have no references to back up your uninformed opinions while I have cited several articles that support mine. How do you dismiss the article about how running CP rail in unseasonably low temperatures costing an extra $61 million? Until you can cite something to support your claims I will not be responding.

Wow, you can't even follow a conversation. The first mention of summer was by you.

How about this?

Those conditions are a normal winter in Alaska. Rail in winter is expensive.

You have no selection bias because you have shown nothing to back up you opinions. Show something that supports your opinion and I may believe you.