Once one makes an assumption and subsequent comparisons are invalid.

If mining for lithium and other battery components is much dirtier than extracting oil then overall batteries may still be dirtier even after recycling is taken into account.

"Suspect" is not good enough. You are also talking about different things. If you want comparisons with oil drilling sites try lithium mines. For oil spills try tailings pond disasters. You still will not get a complete picture

The whole point is that this study only looks at a small part of the comparison between electric and fossil fuel vehicles. To be accurate, the whole life cycle of the products must be compared and not just the parts that make your favorite look good.

Recycling batteries is not a clean process.

I am ignoring nothing. I just gave an example of something missing in the analysis. My point is that any analysis that is incomplete unless it takes into account all aspects of an object. Did you even read my last statement?

I am advocating analyzing everything. It is too easy to skew a report by if one picks and chooses what to analyze.

It also ignores the impact of of the production and disposal of batteries and their components.

This study only analyzes one part of the equation and is far from comprehensive. A full "cradle to grave" analysis needs to be done.

Because the PFS video is a hoax.

How about these?

Would you say the same thing about a print artist who didn't want black an white prints of his colour works sold? You seem to miss the point that he is specifically talking about selling or renting the music he created.

Do you see no difference between "streaming services are not good enough to sell or rent" and "my music is too good for streaming services"? The former is about the quality of the output. The latter is about the quality of the input. See the difference? He said the former, not the latter.

Here is the graph that should put this entire debate to rest. Even though the number of cell phones in use has skyrocketed since 1999 the incidence of brain cancer has not. If there was any causation one would expect an increase in brain cancer. That has not occurred. No correlation therefore no causation.

(please note that correlation can disprove causation but not prove causation)

OK so the Falcon 9 that has launched. Falcon 9 Leo payload 13,150 kg. ISRO LEO payload 1,440 kg. Ratio 9 to 1. So four Falcon 9's equals ISRO program.

India has had a ballistic missile program, which had help from the US, since the mid sixties. While not as advanced as the Apollo program they did not start from square one.

Falcon heavy payload to LEO is 53,000 kg. So one Falcon Heavy can send more mass than 36 ISRO rockets. To put it another way, one Falcon Heavy has launched more mass that all launched ISRO rockets.

This statement is meaningless as it gives no contect.

This statement is more helpful as it points out that there were and extremely low number of incidents in 2013. Doubling a very low number is not difficult. Another thing I just noticed is that these crimes may have nothing to do with hate against LGBT. Just because the victim is LGBT does not mean it is a hate crime.

If someone dies while the situation is being vetted, deployed, negotiated, etc the police will be blamed for not acting swiftly enough or with enough force.

The police are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

You will still be attacked by bored urban white youth.?