Comment Cloaking Device (Score 1) 86
capable of hiding a 40-micrometre object in visible laser light
I would guess that practical applications of this are a few years out
capable of hiding a 40-micrometre object in visible laser light
I would guess that practical applications of this are a few years out
Doesn't there need to be a crime first? Doesn't there need to be evidence indicating that there is a crime to investigate? Without some sort of charge, and naming a statute doesn't cut it, naming a suspected violation of a specific statute seems to be missing. It reminds me of arresting someone for "resisting arrest" wtf? You can call it "retaining evidence", but it seems more like "blindly groping for evidence".
Customs officials were required to have "reasonable cause"to believe an offence had been committed.
Anyone can say they suspect anyone of wrong doing, but it is a whole other ball of wax to back it up. "We have it on good information that you violated XXX". OK, good information from whom? based on what? or do you not have the right to know/face your accuser in NZ?
Funny
What was that a 5 degree bend?
Its called fossils.
Wow! Wow! Wow! Really? We have found "tungsten encapsulated by silicon nitride" fossils?! Those must have been the coolest dinosaurs ever!
"Good artists copy, Great artists steal." Arrrr me harty!
Doh! "knew" . . .
Actually, Blackberry just thought they knew what the customers would need. Apple actually know what the customers would want.
and mcdonalds sold 100 million hamburgers over the same weekend. if you're trying to impress me, apple, you've failed.
I am sure Tim Cook is walking back to his office now, hands in pockets, head held low, shoulders slumped, and wondering what he can do to impress the "Hamburger Lady" if 9 million iPhones won't do it.
The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.