Comment Re:Filthy Ingrates (Score 1) 206
+1.
The sad part is that some idiots will not see the implied <SARCASM> tags.
+1.
The sad part is that some idiots will not see the implied <SARCASM> tags.
If there ever was a +6 Funny, this is the one.
"...so that kids didn't need to learn how to solve them."
I don't think that's actually the *purpose* of the app, any more than the calculator was invented so that kids wouldn't have to learn how to add or multiply.
It's a correlation/causation problem, though. Most engineers are in the top 10% of compensated workers in this country and are of the delusion that since they work hard and get paid well than anyone can work hard and get paid well. They also tend to be predominantly male and white. They also, generally, come from higher socieoeconomic backgrounds. That doesn't necessarily make them right of center, but those tend to be the demographics of the right side of the aisle, regardless of their "logic" or "critical thinking" ability.
What's the difference between a bad golfer and a bad skydiver?
One goes WHAP! Damn!
The other goes DAMN! WHAP!!!!
I wish I had mod points for you.
Data is not copyrightable. Your posts extolling the virtues of free living and your treatise on the need for end to end encryption in email would be completely safe from sale, but your height, weight, dog's name, friend list, favorite meal, phone number and the fact that you spoke often of your hemorrhoids is all just data about you which is non-copyrightable.
The ability to even write a licence where you retain your data and still give them permission to transmit it to a third party (the entire reason for a site with more than a single user) without potentially opening them to liability in the case of a disgruntled user would have to be a masterpiece of lawyering.
The simple fact is that humans are expensive. Even the cheapest human is going to cost you $20-25,000* a year, and you'll need 3-4 humans to provide a single labor slot for full time service in a business which is staffed 5a-9p 7 days a week. Account for downtime, scheduling, and turnover, plus the continuing reduction in cost for complex robotic or electronic replacements, and you'd be a fool to think humans have any chance at competing for these jobs.
This is the 10 hour a week that computers and robots promised us in the 70s. Except that it's not a 10 hour week, but rather a 40 hour week with only one in four people working, because it makes no sense to hire four people part time when you can get one to do the job.
To busy reviewing the Apple/Microsoft bling to realize that computer OSes really shouldn't be about what color the drapes are.
Woman can keep $10G ring reminds me of another court ruling (from another state.)
And no matter what the charter is, if they are liquidated the court will sell all of your data to the highest bidder to pay off creditors.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.