Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Safe = Slow = Low? (Score 1) 567

3) Number of hard stops

Yeah, because what we need the most - besides people who do everything to save a penny - is said people to think about their money first when they encounter a dangerous situation where they _have_ to brake hard. Driving like a turtle on Valium doesn't eliminate other stupid drivers.

Comment Re:The ugly side of nerds (Score 1) 319

I, too, have transcended the need to see a motor and gear operating. However, I'm required to keep my car fit for public traffic. If it's broken and I can't fix it myself, I don't come up with an armchair diagnosis and then run off to the first forum I find on the Internet in a crappy attempt to handle the situation myself.

I go to a fucking repair shop.

But nooo, criminally negligent operation of an Internet connection is perfectly OK and don't you dare to attack the ignorant unique snowflake. Also, fuck the local PC industry, Mr. unique snowflake can perfectly handle this. With MAC addresses on the Internet and all that.

The next time you have to delete another spam mail, thank the OP.

Comment Re:What evidence do you have that you're being DoS (Score 1) 319

For the record: logs from a consumer router imitation mean jack shit.

They stuff all these sophisticated "attack detections" into these crappy devices that constantly bark at pure background noise so the customer feels he bought a good product because it's "constantly fending off the bad guys".

It's all fucking bullshit. You can't defend from a DoS at the edge device that's being hit because the packets already saturated your line when they hit it and there's nothing you can do about it.

My guess about the "article": Clueless armchair admin sees his suckass router barking at him and is making up some elaborate attack scenario because he knows shit.

Slashdot Top Deals

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...