Looks like the science adviser is familiar with the science: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/jou... - as discussed on slashdot three years ago: http://www.science.slashdot.or...
Submitter on the other hand does not know the difference between global warming and climate change. Refers to scientists as 'acolites' seemingly implying that science is a religion.
It is good that a science adviser is versed in the basic science, but it is hardly newsworthy.
Phantom: predictions that matter are the ones that are published. And in those, he is pathetically wrong...
Layzej: Here's one that is bang on.
Phantom: Never mind about the models.
Nelson: Ha ha!
Bingo. You're absolutely correct.
"I've got three witnesses that put you there, DNA evidence, and some video with someone wearing jeans and a white hoodie, just like you wear, though the face isn't visable. You'll get the death penalty. If you give me a confession, we can get it down to manslaughter. First offense. You'll probably just get probation. Here's some paper."
You might like to look up the difference between coercion and deception. One of them is almost always a crime; the other, not so much.
Happiness is twin floppies.