Comment Re:1984 Called (Score 1) 100
You might want to check the moderation on the post you replied to, chuckle.
You might want to check the moderation on the post you replied to, chuckle.
Your link is for a 30 year old watch with a touch screen that lets you enter numbers and symbols.
This story is a new invention watch with a touch screen that lets you enter numbers and symbols and letters.
That's why Microsoft deserves a patent on it.
-
We need to evolve to adapt to this new threat to the species, and instead of seriously *resisting* its effects on our being, we - the true power - direct the feature to our favour. If, out of the NSA catastrophe, we gain a "New Internet" wherein *everything, everywhere* for 15 years, was available to everyone, then we'd have indeed a new era in the human species. A truly evolutionary step, made by mistake - perhaps.
You feel old? Try having a three-digit account number!
(And who is this Toommy Choong guy?)
Slashdot isn't an academic discussion board where precision is required.
Stop being such an obvious troll; or at least try to troll with finesse.
I've been using Model M's (and their Unicomp descendants) since the days of the IBM PC XT. I finally gave them up last year as they are just too loud for my small house. I'm a night owl and my wife thinks 9:00PM is staying up late. She never complained, but I knew my keyboards were keeping her awake some nights. So I reluctantly switched to quieter keyboards two years ago.
"we've known this for a while"
How do you tell the difference between that and "we made it up when our models fell to bits".
I'd guess a reference in archive.org to this idea prevous to 1998 would prove it. Do you have that by chance?
Climate guys learn so much. In 2010 they learned CO2 is consumed by plants and now they're learning hydrology 101. AND IT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING. Oh help.
At this rate they'll be able to make an accurate prediction by about 2637.
I haven't flow in the US in the last year. I've been on commercial aircraft in Australia where the pilot got the wrong frequency when the controller was using "dec-ee-mal". A friend had his class do an experiment where students wrote down numbers that were being read in different styles. There were substantially more errors with the ICAO way of reading numbers than the older FAA style with the Aussie students.
Because this is clearly inferior. Play with it a bit. Play spot the warming.
https://www.climate.gov/news-f...
Note:
1) 1998 - 2015
2) 1880 - 2015
3) 1978 - 1998
4) 1947 - 1957 - this is when all that sea ice grew.[1]
Odd is was so cold at a time of peak smog.[2]
[1]"In the early 1920s and 1930s, temperatures were high, similar to that of the present, and this affected the glacial melt. At the time many glaciers underwent a melt similar or even higher than what we have seen in the last ten years. When it became colder again in the 1950s and 1960s, glaciers actually started growing," says Dr. Kurt H. Kjær - in http://www.nature.com/ngeo/jou...
It was done in one trip.
In the US they use "point" which is one syllable. There is no place in aviation radio where the decimal point isn't implied which makes using "decimal" a bigger waste of radio time.
Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.