I'm afraid I can't do that.

Yes, the English did this in Hong Kong a year or two before handing the island over to the PRC. The building was constructed elsewhere as bunch of "bricks" and then shipped in and assembled.

I think this may have more to it than the KJ translation. I believe in greek it would be DCLXVI, or 500+100+50+10+5+1 which to me looks like a countdown timer or a bunch of numbers in descending order.

I am no bible scholar, so this is just my observation

Try this link instead: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hush-A-Phone_v._United_States

Ok, so they will separate your data from everyone else's, but how do you know they aren't mining your data and storing the index on another machines? Remember, Google is an advertising company first. All of the other products like Postini, gDocs, etc are there just to give them more data to mine.

Your contract may state that they are not allowed to mine or even store your filtered data, but how would you ever know? Good luck executing an eDiscovery search on largest collector of data in the world. I'm sure the attorney's would love it though.

It's really remarkable, isn't it? Does Google sell it's spam filter by any chance?

I think it is called Postini.

Russia shoud realize by now that there is no credible threat of a U.S. nuclear first strike attack:

- There is no advantage gained by crippling Russia economically or socially. A failed Russia causes us more problems than a successful one. See references on the 'end of the Cold War' to see what a successful Russia lead to. No problem for us there. We can do it again.

- Russia's military is sufficiently constrained by economics that it is not the critical, immediate threat it once was. We should be encouraging Russian stability and economic success.

- A nuclear attack of any consequence on Russia would cause multiple environmental disasters of both more immediate and more intense concern than glbal climate change. Rendering much of Eastern Europe, the Caucuses, and potentially China and the Indian sub-continent either uninhabitable or medically dangerous would not serve any purpose. Nuclear attacks on even a regional scale must be considered 'doomsday' responses by all major nuclear powers. In light of this reality, the real threats are North Korea and potentially Iran, since they do not have the resources to make large-scale nuclear attacks, and so could calculate a scenario where an attack could be survivable for them. Mutually Assured Destruction is very near, it not already at, the end of its usefulness.

- Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, their capacity is not only constrained, but their sphere of influence is reduced. Less reason than ever to try to suppress Russian efforts at influence around the world.

But Global Climate Change has taken us down a road of questionable science, apathy by the masses, and governmental distraction from real, solvable problems. Reducing nuclear weapon stockpiles dramatically would solve a lot of problems between the U.S. and Russia, and including the major nuclear powers as the process moves forward would eventually bring us close enough to nuclear disarmament that we could engage the lesser powers and make a credible demand for their disarmament also. Then we can legitimately challenge ALL weapons-grade processing and put a stop to this dance we are in with North Korea and Iran. Sadly, we can't get there in time to address Iran's nuclear ambitions.

A significant nuclear weapons release will do more harm to our climate and planet than the worst the Global Climate Change crowd can imagine. It would render Climate Change unimportant. No one would care about failed crops from land poisoned by fallout. No one would care about UV exposure and sea level rise if they are battling cancer and indirect, long range radiation poisoning. No one would care about lost habitat and lost biodiversity in the midst of massive and fatal mutations. The jig would be up. I would be entirely aghast if both our incoming Presidents and Russian Presidents did not each get through briefings on the impact of even small releases, at least from the civilian agencies interested in this (State, FEMA, DOE, EPA, DOAgriculture, and maybe a few others) and russian counterparts. The military, despite our instincts, generally would prefer to offer an honest view of strategic ware outcomes. They also would have good reason to caution incoming Presidents against nuclear war. I would not be surprised if our secret strategy would be to back down from any threat. How we would handle an 'unexpected' massive first strike, I dunno. Again, if the schoolyard bully knows there's a bigger bully down the street that has a little brother in his school, does he go in and beat up the bigger bully's little brother? Only when he loses restraint, or the bigger bully loses credibility.

So far, we have not lost credibility on either side.

There are fewer reasons than ever to have a nuclear war.

Competition for adopting babies is pretty fierce.

Only the white ones. There is a shortage of families willing to adopt black children. It has gotten better over the last year, but two years ago some agencies were offering 25-50% discounts if you considered black or mixed race babies.

Consider the fact that a full adoption is more often than not a years-long process (waiting lists, background checks, etc), requires a lot more effort to complete, and often costs more than whatever this particular treatment will cost?

In the U.S., this is only the case when you want a white baby at birth. If you have no racial preference, but reasonable restrictions on the birth-mom's health (not epileptic, no drinking/pot when pregnant, etc) you can have a newborn in less than a year for about $10-15k. If you go through the state's foster system, and you are less restrictive on age, you could easily adopt in less than 6 months and just pay the processing fees which are usually less than $200.

Compare that for fertility treatments, and then different in-vitro procedures, adoption is still cheaper. There are agencies out there that charge much more($25-40k)for domestic adoptions, but they are generally geared toward people who want white children from mom's of a certain background, and they provide more services to birth-mom during the pregnancy.

I somewhat disagree about your point that we all want to pass on our own genetic material. I think that most people are not exposed to adoption, or are only exposed to the Hallmark Channel's interpretation of adoption, so they never look at it as an adoption.

You've come to the right place....

Leave Quebec out of this.

If she is only retaining the logs of the IP addresses for a few months, and did not know this order was coming, she is safe.

FRCP Rule 37 states:

This may sound facetious, but I had a similar question the first time I saw a large Sodium-sulfide (NaS) battery. It was the size of a garden shed, and basically was filled with molten sodium. The engineers said that it was safe from thunderstorms, tornadoes, tree falls, and earthquakes. My first question was "it is safe from two or three of those if they happen at the same time?"

A now very pale engineer answered "no". I guess they hadn't considered a tree falling on it in the rain, and we all know how much fun sodium is when it gets wet...

No, its Frahnkensteen

How about Semperubisububium

Always wear under wear