Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Fool me once, fool me twice. (Score 1) 622

So, given the fact that humans will be humans (seems to be the common excuse for taking nude photos in the first place), I'm curious...how many of these celebrities have publicly come out in favor of hardened security devices or other protocols to take to ensure ANY data isn't leaked next time?

Yeah, I'll believe they're serious about protecting themselves when they take appropriate action.

And for you crypto companies who might have a few bones to throw around, NOW is the perfect time for that celebrity endorsement...

Comment The Camel Union. (Score 1) 367

"These days, jeeps are in common use in the desert, as are light planes and even dune buggies, and satellite images could also easily have been taken instead," she said. "(Google) should leave camels out of its activites altogether."

Aaaaand this is the part where we find the Royal Union of Camel Jockeys refused to allow Google to use anything but their approved methods of transport across said desert.

Ironically, this has been a camels job for a few thousand years now, so I fail to see any inhumane treatment here. I'm assuming Google also should refuse the use of donkeys when documenting the grand canyon as well, or did they?

In other words, When in Rome...

Comment The Medical of Things. (Score 2) 92

"...Early products to use the technology will include 'audio visual and medical devices'..."

Uh, I'm sorry. Any company mentioning medical devices and the Internet of Things in the same sentence brings the death knell in my mind.

Whatever pathetic security model they're thinking of shoveling into this device at the last minute before trying to ride the next billion-dollar revenue wave won't be enough.

Keep your damn Internet of Things away from medical devices until you learn to implement at least common sense security. This ain't the next iPod killer, someone's life is at stake.

While you're drooling over the projected revenue numbers, you might want to listen to your lawyers during the risk analysis part of the presentation...

Comment Re:Ebola threat (Score 1) 478

The parent is right. Level 4 containment is exactly what the CDC mandates themselves in order to even study this virus or warehouse it. If it were "easy" to contain, you sure as hell wouldn't have those kinds of insanely expensive precautions being taken to store it in a jar.

It's easy to contain, but very high risk if it gets out, so it gets high containment.

The world is not a laboratory, and since the inception of the virus almost 40 years ago, this is the first true test of just how "easy" it is to contain.

Doesn't look so damn easy right now.

Comment Re:Ebola threat (Score 1) 478

Ebola is about as contagious as Hepatitis C. It is less contagious than HIV, SARS, Mumps, and Measles.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/02/352983774/no-seriously-how-contagious-is-ebola

Ebola has been around since 1976. Before now, deaths have rarely numbered in the hundreds, and quite often in the tens during "outbreaks".

Has anyone contracted Hep C, AIDS, or SARS via a brushed glove against the face, as is the suspicion with an Ebola infection in Spain?

Get back to me when we have some actual hard numbers of large Ebola outbreaks to solidify this, because right now it's nothing more than a theory that has NEVER been actually seen widespread in nature. Let's hope neither nature nor mankind takes this bastard airborne through mutation.

Comment Re:Ebola threat (Score 5, Insightful) 478

We need to stop pretending that Ebola is no easier to catch than HIV or other pathogens that are carried by the same bodily fluids

It spreads easier than AIDS, but not as easily as the flue. Because of the way it spreads, it's easy to contain. Look, I'm not the only one saying this here, the head of CDC said it too, if you had even read the summary. But MozeeToby on the internet is worried, so we should all freak out?

The parent is right. Level 4 containment is exactly what the CDC mandates themselves in order to even study this virus or warehouse it. If it were "easy" to contain, you sure as hell wouldn't have those kinds of insanely expensive precautions being taken to store it in a jar.

And I sure as hell hope you're not eating those "easy to contain" words 6 months from now.

And the head of the CDC is like any other elected official. They are not there to start a panic during a crisis, so regardless of the seriousness of it, they are going to downplay it to a level just below widespread speculation and panic, even if the concerns are actually far greater.

Comment Re:Alternative headline (Score 1) 429

Vigilante beats up on people in order to get public wifi access that he believes is rightfully his

That's what it amounts to. He can't get the access he wants, so he just pushes his way in and takes it.

If access is so important to your work, why aren't you/they paying for it?

Let's not bullshit ourselves here. There's a strong chance said Bittorrent whore is using that protocol to download free content they would otherwise be forced to pay for.

And here you are assuming said person is going to pay for internet service?

Fat chance.

Comment Re:The Nobel Prize Committee blew it (Score 4, Interesting) 276

It really is insulting to give a Nobel prize for an improvement to a revolutionary idea, and ignore the person who did the original work. Without Holonyak's original work there would be no basis for the improvement.

And where does the buck stop in this argument? Or should Nobels drift endlessly backwards to Newton, Leibniz, Aristotle, Plato ... Thales of Miletus. Thales of Miletus? All Nobels go to him?

If you're still alive to receive the prize and can feel the sting of the slap in the face when you are passed over, then I'd say that's the litmus test.

If you're dead, well you probably didn't get the email...

Comment Re:Its not the technology - it is the tech company (Score 1) 238

When high tech companies offshore cash to avoid taxes, it is no wonder people don't trust the technology. They don't trust the technology companies.

Yes, and isn't it ironic that the very reason they don't like technology companies that do this is because of their capitalistic goals to increase financial wealth.

Perhaps it's not so much irony as it is proving his point dead on.

Comment Re:Color Me Surprised (Score 1) 335

If that is what you call a defense, I'd sure as hell hate to see them on the offensive.

Burning books while a crowd of thousands cheers? For all their might, the Powers That Be are ultimately just figments of collective imagination. A nation can't arrest or shoot you, it needs someone to do so on its behalf. And if the only reason why anyone might obey is fear, the entire system is one realization away from collapse. What happened in the former Soviet block is an excellent demonstration of just how that works.

Yes, and that "nation" you speak of that can't arrest or shoot you is called the Military Industrial Complex.

You know, the very same Complex that is now arming Sheriff Bubba Joe and his merry band of misfits in with armored troop carriers and other "necessities" to perform their job.

Even the Roman emperors knew their power stemmed from public support, not armed might, hence the need to provide bread and circuses.

Oh you mean the 51st State in the US? It's not on too many maps. Kind of hard to miss though, as it's a massive State. We call it Welfare

Of course, this is all ignoring the fact that US is a democracy. You don't need a revolution to change the people in charge, you simply need to express support for someone else, and anonymously at that. So if the rulers approve of bullshit like this, and still get re-elected, then don't blame the Government, blame the citizens.

The citizens don't give a shit anymore. Apathy controls them. You'll see that when the next voter turnout is half of what it was before.

And when elected positions are replaced with appointed Czars (a.k.a. the good ol' corrupt boys club), it's hard to convince anyone that any form of democracy still exists within our elected leadership today.

Comment Re:Color Me Surprised (Score 5, Insightful) 335

Sigh.

If nothing else, at least it's out in the open where they have to defend it.

The Old Government response: We cannot confirm nor deny that we were involved in such activity.

The New Government response: Yeah. We did it. What the fuck are you gonna do about it, peasant. Piss off, or we'll label you a terrorist too.

If that is what you call a defense, I'd sure as hell hate to see them on the offensive.

Comment Re:A lease on a CPO might be interesting... (Score 1) 126

I'm taking it you don't own a Tesla? Either you don't know or you're hiding the truth behind exactly how expensive their maintenance plans are. Funny, I never spent that much on my ICE to keep it on the road.

Uh, that "expensive" pre-paid multi-year plan works out to $450/year.

For an $80,000 vehicle.

From Acura to Volvo and every premium brand in between, you honestly think you can find a stealership that will charge that little of an amount to support any of their luxury vehicles for a year?

Yeah, good luck with that. You'll find out very quickly why we call them stealerships.

Comment Re:Chapter 11 is not business death. (Score 1) 171

The hair tells the story. He has surrounded himself with 'yes men'.

Nobody has the nerve to ask him: 'Have you ever seen a good combover on anybody else? Then why do you think yours is good?'

If the billionaire who infamously owns the worlds most famous combover has no idea just how bad he looks at this point, then I welcome the continued mocking.

That level of ignorance deserves it.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...