You there! Stop talking! Eyes back on the computer screen!
Ha ha! Jokes on them. I can zone out and do nothing for hours while looking at a screen full of code.
because it absolves you of the actual question of what drives interest.
Which is: the interactions of groups of atoms which are mechanically compelled to gather more groups of atoms and assemble them into nearly identical forms to themselves. Or have I zoomed in on the issue too far?
While in my opinion, there is enough independent evidence to cautiously suggest that global warming (which itself is not in dispute in scientific circles) is more likely to make bush fires worse than better
Why? Climate Change does not automatically make every area more prone to the kinds of disasters that frequently occur there. Why wouldn't it lessen the chance for severe wild fires? This is the kind of thinking that fuels "deniers". It's always, smaller polar caps, retreating glaciers, intensified tornadoes, wildfires, hurricanes, rising sea levels. Why not more rain in the desert or semi-arid farmland? Or the shifting of severe weather events to another area? More snow for the ski areas. Less rain for flood prone areas. Why is it always worse?
The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood