Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Considerable resources? (Score 5, Insightful) 214

by Sperbels (#49234473) Attached to: Billionaire Teams Up With NASA To Mine the Moon

Nobody should have any qualms about mining anything on the Moon

Apparently you didn't see the shit-fit people were throwing several years ago when we deliberately crashed a probe into the moon to observe the composition of the regolith it kicked up. Dumping trash on the moon they said. Ridiculous, but there are apparently quite a few people on Slashdot who had this opinion.

Comment: Re:Considerable resources? (Score 2) 214

by Sperbels (#49234419) Attached to: Billionaire Teams Up With NASA To Mine the Moon
None. That's my point. If you want build anything off planet, it is inefficient to bring the materials from earth. Yes, I know the article was billing this project as a way to get valuable metals for use here on Earth....but that strikes me as ridiculous...just something they tell the public to attract investment and positive attitudes. The real money is too far into the future after infrastructure is created.

Comment: It wasn't about Pluto (Score 4, Informative) 196

by Sperbels (#49155581) Attached to: One Astronomer's Quest To Reinstate Pluto As a Planet
Don't make it sound so sinister. The vote wasn't to demote Pluto. It was a vote to settle on the criteria an astronomical body must meet in order to be a planet. This was necessary because we've found more Pluto like bodies, and chances are we'll find more in the decades to follow.

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.