While in my opinion, there is enough independent evidence to cautiously suggest that global warming (which itself is not in dispute in scientific circles) is more likely to make bush fires worse than better
Why? Climate Change does not automatically make every area more prone to the kinds of disasters that frequently occur there. Why wouldn't it lessen the chance for severe wild fires? This is the kind of thinking that fuels "deniers". It's always, smaller polar caps, retreating glaciers, intensified tornadoes, wildfires, hurricanes, rising sea levels. Why not more rain in the desert or semi-arid farmland? Or the shifting of severe weather events to another area? More snow for the ski areas. Less rain for flood prone areas. Why is it always worse?
A liberal administration isnt going to crack down on porn; it would alienate huge parts of their base.
You mean like how the DEA is still going after medical marijuana dispensaries in Denver despite Obama supporting legalization? http://www.denverpost.com/news...
Even if we solve the propulsion problem, there's another problem--uncharted objects like this.
If we could actually speed a ship up to anywhere near the speed of light, even hitting a pebble is likely to blow up your spaceship.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.