I have 5gbps/5gbps fiber. The ONIT has a 10gbps ethernet port that I run to my router. I then have a second 10gbps port from that to my desktop. I can speed test around 7gpbs on a good day. My wifi is what most devices in my home use so the 5gbps doesn't help the speed there, but it does help with the congestion of all the devices using the upstream (cameras, zoom, etc).

I pay less than the 1200/20 Comcast offering in my area which was usually around 500mbps/20mbps. I love rural indiana.

Can you prove that?

You're telling me that I can't only let BMWs park on my lot during game days?

But there is competition. Not only in the App Store, but there is android. It's not like you have to buy an iPhone. I picked an iPhone because it was a walled garden, it's also why I push it on my family whom rely on me to support them. Now I have to explain to them that these new app stores are unsafe and can 'steal their stuff' and deal with the fallout.

It's stupid, anyone who wanted these things should have bought from the competition!

If you put the trash out to the curb the NSA doesn't need a warrant either. Stop leaving your data in the hands of corporations.

You are misinformed. https://www.macrumors.com/2024...

3rd party browser engines will be allowed in the EU on 3rd party app stores. Now why you might want a 3rd party engine? Well probably because you have sites that just don't work in safari. I love safari and I use it every day on my MacBook and my iPhone, yet I still have to have chrome installed because things just often do not work properly in safari.

I have read the summary 3 times now. I have no fucking clue what it is trying to tell me.

I'm fairly sure this is how the US bankrupted the USSR. The question is do we think China is the USSR or the US in this situation?

When they made this announcement there were still several features that require IPv4. It looks more complete now https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vp... but I wonder how sharp the edge cases are.

"What the market can bear". So if $11 is too expensive for most people, we won't get to 11, we will get to 10.99 or 9.99 or WHATEVER THE MARKET CAN BEAR. It is antithetical to the responsibility a CEO owes their shareholders to charge less for something when the data points to everyone just being ok paying more. Should companies earn record profits? Why shouldn't they if everyone just keeps paying it. Don't like it? Start a competitor? This is capitalism.

As a share holder, you want them to find exactly that threshold of what the market can bear. Why would I want them selling socks at 99 cents when the public will pay 11 bucks for them? Does this hurt the poor? Sure it does. But this is capitalism and I want every cent.

Stackoverflow

I'd call it stack overflow.

To me they are like books. If I am enjoying myself I want to read as many chapters as I can. If it sucks I just stick it on my shelf for others to see and think "that guy reads".

I never rewatch things. To me paying $15- 30 for a season of a show I like is cheaper than paying $14 a month while it slow rolls out. I'm at an age though where I don't watch enough TV to matter. Most days the TV is on OTA and is just background noise.

This is why I'm probably done with sports. College football is the worst at it too. It's a shame, but I guess they don't want a 40 year old man watching sports anymore. It's for the kids with all their fancy streaming services.

Amazon often makes the first episode free. I also like I can just buy whole seasons. Cheaper than a monthly fee.