perhaps they don't care
I think this is the case.
They are not an EUSSR based company, so why would they comply with the EUSSR's undemocratic laws?
I've said here time and time again that it's one thing to create laws that you want to apply outside of your jurisdiction, it's another thing to enforce them. Which is, as we see here, not possible.
They won't give up on half a billion relatively wealthy consumers.
Until they're sick and tired of Brussel's Politburo, and do.
they didn't even elect the CCP.
Indeed, they didn't. They killed each other during a civil war for it.
This is the reason I haven't bought an iPhone for 16 years.
And that's how it should be.
If you don't like a product, don't buy it.
Unelected dictators have no business dictating what features go in products.
For Muni's 54 bus, which traverses San Francisco's southern edge, the vehicle blocking its way early last month was a driverless Waymo that got stranded between rows of parked cars. A human driver would have reversed, clearing space for the bus, which is not allowed to back up without a supervisor.
Sounds like this problem could have been solved with the bus backing up. This issue was at least in part created due to this stupid rule.
If he had solar panels, why did he need the EV?
Didn't you read the article? His car is now "an emissions-free backup generator".
Just like those conmen on Amazon that sell battery storage as a "generator", the WaPo likes to greenwash anything that has to do with EVs...
One a side note, I have panels, too, and they shut off in the event of a power outage to prevent backfeeding the grid and killing linemen (or linemenwomen, or linemenpersons).
hat just rings back to the old joke about how many google results you get by searching "muslims outraged..."
About 12,500,000 results (0.71 seconds)
Yes, those are called "laws" and are the basis of a function society.
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
If you tell me how to operate my network, you infringe on my property rights.
Ever wondered why rent control never makes it to the Supreme Court? Because it would be shot down.
Yeah, laws and shit.
Would you like to lie again[cnn.com]?
Sabri's law: "Anyone using CNN as a credible source of information ends the discussion and loses the argument".
CNN is not news, it's propaganda.
And to balance it out: so is Fox Noise.
The cratering stock price of NFLX probably has more to do with Wall Street's perception of the company than anything Reed Hastings did. The company grew and grew for years and had a P/E ratio that assumed that it would continue to grow for years. Eventually, just about everyone that might want Netflix was subscribing to Netflix and suddenly growth dried up.
The net result of going woke
Netflix is a good example of Go Woke, Get Broke.
It seems to work for Hulu?
Hulu didn't go mentally woke as Netflix.
Go woke, get broke.
Let's play devil's advocate for a second.
Yes, a "police force" with an operating area of 2.8 square kilometers, covering 8,700 residents, needs a staff of 1,355 people to operate.
This is not a government police force, this is a corporate police force that paid enough bribes to the local city council.
On top of that, it is enforcing U.K. laws well beyond their own jurisdiction.
Github are akin to Chinese censors for allowing this. Fuck Github.
Work expands to fill the time available. -- Cyril Northcote Parkinson, "The Economist", 1955
