Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:NOOOOOOOOO (Score 1) 293

Sorry, the number zero was an created 3700 years ago, and not in India.

Sorry, but you're wrong, racist, and fat.

"By 1740 BCE the Egyptians had a symbol for zero in accounting texts. The symbol nfr, meaning beautiful, was also used to indicate the base level in drawings of tombs and pyramids and distances were measured relative to the base line as being above or below this line." - wikipedia

So Egypt 3,700 years ago.

"The concept of zero as a number and not merely a symbol or an empty space for separation is attributed to India, where, by the 9th century AD, practical calculations were carried out using zero, which was treated like any other number, even in case of division"

So India 1,100 years ago

Comment Re:NOOOOOOOOO (Score 2) 293

Sorry, the decimal system was being used in other places than India over 3000 years ago.

And india is hardly a great use of numbers -- paying 10,00,000 rather than 1,000,000 rupees for something. Non standard and confusing.

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: Can some of us get together and rebuild this community? 21

wbr1 writes: It seems abundantly clear now that Dice and the SlashBeta designers do not care one whit about the community here. They do not care about rolling in crapware into sourceforge installers. In short, the only thing that talks to them is money and stupid ideas.

Granted, it takes cash to run sites like these, but they were fine before. The question is, do some of you here want to band together, get whatever is available of slashcode and rebuild this community somewhere else? We can try to make it as it once was, a haven of geeky knowledge and frosty piss, delivered free of charge in a clean community moderated format.

Comment Re:"Looks like we got ourselves a thinker!" (Score 1, Insightful) 412

Gameshows are supposed to be interesting to watch

Really? I watched an gameshow on a US network once. The format was something like this

[commercials]
Previously: [recap asking one question for 3 minutes]
Now: ask new question, guy gives new answer, guy founds out if he's right [4 minutes]
Next: [preview guy being asked more questions for 2 minutes]
[commercials]

And so on. If you trim it down you get about 15 minutes an hour of new material. That's not interesting.

Comment Re:"humbled"? (Score 1) 293

(C) He thinks that being made CEO is a punishment for some mistake he's made in his current job.

Being made CEO of a dead end company with almost no help for salvation that's been run into the ground for the last 10+ years is Punishment

Comment Re:For Testing (Score 0) 140

What's a fake account?

Given their terms of service your testing account is almost certainly fake. If you only look at it to "like" stuff that you don't even care enough about to do so publicly, its fake, (as is your "like").

I only know a few people with facebook accounts who don't have a second so-called "testing" account, plus a couple accounts they started and then abandoned.

So I'm thinking the 50% number is closer to the mark than the 10%

I only knew a few people with facebook accounts who have a second "testing" account, so I'm thinking the 1% number is closer to the mark than 10%

See how the plural of anecdote is not data?

Comment Re:Silent to me, at least (Score 1) 371

After hearing the conversations around me for the first time in several decades, I promptly removed it for good. (I have an unreasonable fear that stupidity might be contagious when exposed to large amounts of same)

It's like Facebook, all the time, with fewer cats

Comment Re:I don't mean to belittle the will to do so... (Score 1) 150

But this has long since ceased to be any sort of technical challenge or accomplishment.

Putting a lander on the moon (or, even, for that matter, a human) is not much of a technical challenge, insofar as needing to do anything other than learn how to properly use complex (but well-known) technology.

The U.S. can't rebuild Saturn V rockets. Hell it can't even put someone into low earth orbit.

Space is still hard.

Comment Re:Here come the rednecks (Score 1) 150

Ok. So here's a question: it's 2014, not 1965. Which space program would you rather have: the USA's, China's, or Russia's? Which one is having the most success *right now*? Which one is roving Mars? Orbiting Saturn? Exploring interstellar space? Heading to Pluto? Would you really trade even up for Russia's Soyuz? Because it seems like that's about what they have going right now.

Only one way for thee and me to get into space, and that's Russia.

And China of course. India may well be next.

Comment Re:Here come the rednecks (Score 1) 150

Ok. So here's a question: it's 2014, not 1965. Which space program would you rather have: the USA's, China's, or Russia's? Which one is having the most success *right now*? Which one is roving Mars? Orbiting Saturn? Exploring interstellar space? Heading to Pluto? Would you really trade even up for Russia's Soyuz? Because it seems like that's about what they have going right now.

Only one way for thee and me to get into space, and that's Russia.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberrys!" -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Working...