Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment No way (Score 1) 290

Phones have become extensions of our lives, and if they aren't if they aren't properly protected, we're all screwed.

Besides, it's not like the authorities can't get at the info if they really want it. It's been several times that police and even the FBI have tried to force the issue to make people give them passwords, or companies to provide backdoors, etc and claimed that if they didn't, there was no way the authorities could ever get at the suspected evidence on those devices. After weeks, months, or even longer, they lose and stop pester the people & companies.
Then low and behold, they somehow cracked the protection on the phone and have all the data...

Basically their claims that they can't access it is a lie.
What they really want is very fast, easy, and convenient access.
In other words, the cops want to be easily able to violate you rights carte blanche because they are lazy.

Comment Problems (Score 1) 134

It's not a new idea, it's only fairly recently that we'd have the ability to even map out the complexity of a mouse brain.
Of course the entire thing will be slowed down by having to simulate connection speeds between neurons, when some simulated neurons are on the same chip, and others are on chip. (I'm going with the idea memory chips rather than something like a hard drive).
Of course, organic brains, even something as simple as a mouses brain, is operating in parallel that exceeds any computer the researches can potentially afford at this time. So to deal with that, they're going to have to keep things synchronized by doing a limited number of calculations at once, and go through the states of every neuron for a single tiny fragment of time, so the system will be slowed down to a great extent due to this.
I have no idea how much all this extra time will take, but it could as crazy as one second of mouse time could be hours, days, or even years of our time.
A mouse brain has about seventy million or more neurons.
Now we can't forget that neurons fire at different levels, which might change how the signaling in the brain works, that's something we're still trying to quantify, but it's not a binary thing of on/off.
We know that the synapses move and change, which is effectively the wiring of the brain, and we don't know the rules that control that.
Memory, which is used to influence a lot of actions, is still mostly a mystery to us, but we do know that it involves breaking/changing DNA, something we can't do with hardware, but will have to have yet another abstraction layer with it's own data in the simulation.
Even if we get all that stuff worked out, we still have a LOT to learn about the brain and what it's composed of. There are some ideas that certain structures in the neurons function as quantum processors, and there's not one or two per neuron, it's more. (An article I saw last year indicates more than a dozen in a human neuron, but that was last year that I read it.) If they actually do have quantum processing, then not only does that brain get's so much more complicated and would now require a quantum computer to process, and our current quantum computers are horrifyingly primitive and only handle a hand full of qbits.

Now despite all those drawbacks, their research certainly holds value, but people expecting to be able to make sci-fis brain dumps/ brain tapes/ mental clones/ etc. are not only flat out of luck, but looking wistfully for something still deep in the realms of fiction.

Comment Another issue (Score 2) 165

Another issue that people often don't take into account, plenty of companies keep re-using the same small set of tapes over and over. By the time they need to restore, the data on the tape is corrupted because the tape was sub-par when they backed up. Each use of a tape wears off some of the recording material on it, before too many uses, it's trash, at least if you want accurate and uncorrupted files. Disks don't have that kind of problem, as their recording surfaces aren't actually being bent or touched during use.
You have no idea how many companies I've talked to that kept rotating the same 6 or less tapes, or even a single tape, and now that something went bits up and they need to restore from backup, they find out the data on the tape is trashed. (Far too many over the years of doing tech support.)

Comment Re:This is shoddy science and/or shoddy reporting. (Score 1) 54

That's the difference between generations with various levels of malnutrition and those raised with sufficient nutritious food.
There's now an average of 3" in height difference between North and South Korea.
It's due to North Korea's food shortages and poor quality of much of that same food.

Since WW2, Japan has had average heights increasing as well since their food distribution and quality of nutrition has greatly improved.

It's been studied and is pretty clearly documented, poor quality nutrition and lack of food during development causes deficiencies in the populace. Also, it can't be fixed in just a single generation because of the epigenetic changes that get inherited as well. (It was thought that epigenetic changes don't affect offspring, but that has been disproven. They are still doing research on how all that happens, though they have verified it's existence.)

Comment Re:Yep, like my son. (Score 1) 149

Not even close, and even getting the vaccine only makes you resistant, you can still catch it, though it won't be as bad if you weren't vaccinated.
Not to mention, your immune system doesn't treat all infections the same, and it can forget them which will reduce or even wipe out it's effectiveness over that pathogen over time.
After all, this isn't some simple video game, it's the human immune system, which though rather amazing, is exceedingly complex and full of flaws.

It seems the vaccine also protects better than exposure does since the vaccine is made to target the protein spike, while the usual method of gathering info from pathogens to create an immune response in the body targets proteins on the viral shell, which change to avoid host immune responses.

There are a lot of simplified articles and videos on how the immune system functions, and there are ones that go way beyond those simplified ones to list and even detail far more of the steps the body takes to defend itself from pathogens. What you learned in high school about it is about the same level as explaining a stunt car drivers amazing performance using their custom built all wheel steering with active suspension and double clutch transmission as "a person sits in car and turns with the wheel and presses on pedals to make it go".
Yes, what they taught us in high school about the immune system is effectively baby talk for that field.

Comment Synthetic Human Memory... (Score 1) 21

Considering the inefficiencies and complete malleability of human memory that's absolutely a horrible idea for anything other than novelty.

Human memory is totally unreliable, massively subject to change, and has lousy retention and long term recovery.

Sure, we make do with it, and mostly don't realize when it's wrong because it's the only memory we've got, but just think about how many times somebody else remembers something differently than you do, and that's only the tip of the iceberg since you mostly don't compare detailed memories very often.

This kind of thing isn't usable for computing or industrial applications. They'll have to make it far better than human memory and essentially involatile as well.

Still, it is a neat development. Maybe it will eventually result in a better ability to understand and work with human memory.

Comment What a horrible idea (Score 1) 122

First, face recognition still sucks no matter what marketing lies are told, and emotion recognition is at least as terrible.

Second, being forced to put on false smiles is mentally oppressive and I'd bet very bad for your psychological health.
I'm sure you've all heard about the dangers of suppressing your emotions... Well here's a corporate policy to do exactly that!

Somehow we all knew that something like this could only be born in China or North Korea, except NK probably can't either afford or obtain the tech.

Comment Efficient? (Score 1) 247

In this case they are obviously talking about an efficiency of protein/calories per area of land, and not as in cost$ to produce.
Business in this world mostly prefer the method that's more efficient in $ rather than land.
For that matter, if it was less costly, they wouldn't use 1 acre and let the other 9 revert to forest, they'd use all 10 acres and we all know that.

Would it be popular? Not as a protein powder. Nobody actually "likes" protein powder. But I'm sure marketing would find a way to make it a bit more tolerable, but still not as good as "real food".

Of course starvation is far worse than lousy food. In famines people will try to eat nearly anything, including grass, twigs, boiled shoes, etc. (literally)
We do still have famines in this world, though sometimes the reasons for or repercussions of the famine make ending it early difficult or even impossible.
They say the world already produces enough food for everyone, but it's distribution is horrible.

Now setting up this kind of thing for a region affected by famine, or even just high levels of starvation might be a great thing if possible.

Seems the best use of this technology is that you don't need arable land and can set it up almost anywhere you get sufficient sunlight, air, and the temperature is in a range viable for the bioreactor without exceeding the power availability limits.
Something like that might even be ideal for an installation on Mars, though you'd still have to compensate for temperature and the new issue of the extremely thin atmosphere, but we have tech that can do it well enough if it has the electricity to run those machines.

If anyone is wondering (probably not), sci-fi is full of basic food like this for the populace, though usually it's used by the poor. We've turned a few paradigms like those on their heads with some things from fiction when they became real things, who knows, maybe it will be the "designer food" of the rich.

Comment Re:Fundamentally Flawed Argument (Score 1) 65

Nobody is going to pay $20-$60 for a 30 year old game that you need an emulator to even run.
(Yes, there are some pirate cartridges that you can load things on, but good luck getting one of those over the last 15 years.)

It's been well studied, and only a tiny fraction of downloads are "lost sales", and even that only applies when such a product is still available for sale, which is NOT the case with the nintendo cartridges.

(Sure, you can randomly find them at a garage sale once in a while, but there's no sales of new cartridges, or even used ones from nintendo or authorized resellers. Also, very rarely someone finds an unused cartridge in the attic and auctions it off for stupid money, but that's not a viable market by any stretch of the imagination.)

Of course nintendo lied about all that, it's not like they've ever played fair with anyone, not even other corporations.

Slashdot Top Deals

I program, therefore I am.

Working...