194585
submission
cowens writes:
The last Ask Slashdot article got me to thinking about what reasons people have (or think they have) to close source code. Are any of these reasons valid? Can you think of any other reasons?
- You believe that your source code is so revolutionary that closing it will act as a significant barrier to your competitors.
- You are embarrassed by the code's lack of quality and are afraid of ridicule.
- You wish to license someone else's code and they are not FOSS friendly.
- You are afraid someone might discover a security flaw by examining the source code and exploit the flaw rather than reporting it to you.
- You are afraid of losing control of the project (similar to point 1).
- You have not actually considered why you want to close the source; AKA you are an idiot.
- It is what you have always done before; AKA you are a dinosaur and see point 6.
177947
story
nuts-to-CBS writes
"After presenting 'Jericho' fans with a cliffhanging season finale, CBS promptly cancelled the program. The shocked fans quickly banded together, many using CBS' own public "Jericho" discussion forum, and began brainstorming on ways to convince the network to bring back the show for a second season. A plot point in the final episode of "Jericho" involving the expletive "Nuts!" (in reference to an historic conversation between generals) was turned into a campaign to send large quantities of nuts to CBS' NY, LA, and affiliate offices. Fans have sent a total of $26,000 for a pooled campaign hosted at Nuts Online to ship over 19,000 pounds of peanuts to CBS.
Other efforts acquired over $9,000 to publish full page advertisements in
Variety (National Edition)
and The Hollywood Reporter for Tuesday, May 29th. This is expected to become the largest ever fan campaign to bring a television show back from cancellation." There's more about the massive fan rollout below.
170127
story
quanticle writes
"According to House Democrats, broadband isn't broadband unless its at least 2Mbps. The view of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications is that the FCC's data collection standards are hopelessly outdated, and is proposing a number of updates to their criteria. For one, they want 'broadband' reclassified to at least 2mbs, up from 200kbps. Another requirement will change the FCC's outlook on broadband availability. Just because one household in a zip code has broadband access, that will not longer mean everyone in the zip code does. 'The plan went over well with the consumer advocates who appeared before the subcommittee. Larry Cohen, president of the Communication Workers of America, said that the US is "stuck with a twentieth century Internet" and that he would support increasing the "broadband" definition to 2Mbps. Ben Scott of Free Press echoed that sentiment, suggesting that the definition needs to be an evolving standard that increases over time, which is in contrast to the current FCC definition; it has not changed in nine years. "We have always been limited by the FCC's inadequate and flawed data," he said.'"
149391
story
jcatcw writes
"Microsoft knows how you like your Office Suite. You like Ribbons ... they're a given, right? Well, if not, Computerworld reviews some third-party packages that allow you to customize the software's interface. Classic Menu gives you an Office-2003-like set of menus. It'll help you navigate old menu structures to find favorite commands, but don't expect to use all the familiar keyboard shortcuts. ToolbarToggle lets you customize the menus. However, Classic Menu has two advantages over ToolbarToggle: It's available for PowerPoint today, and it includes Office 2007 commands on its menus, a modification you can't make to ToolbarToggle menus. RibbonCustomizer works within the Ribbon's own constraints to let you change the display of icons and commands on existing tabs or any new ones you create."
131439
submission
aardwolf64 writes:
Yesterday, Nintendo release the full edition of the Wii browser. Anyone with an Internet connected Wii was greeted by the blue glow informing them of a system message. It took me almost 5 minutes to find the first bug. The first thing I did was fire it up and try one of my internal websites. The URL is http://192.168.2.3/NFP, and it is case-sensitive. Apparently the Wii browser can only type in uppercase at the very beginning of the URL. Once something not-uppercased has been entered, using the Shift or Caps-Lock keys are useless. The workaround is to type NFP first in all caps, then go back and type the first part of the URL. Have you discovered any bugs so far?
131177
submission
1mck writes:
With all of the attention on how great Linux is over other operating systems with regards to stability, updating, and maintaining it, I have to ask why aren't mainstream video games being developed for Linux? I have talked with hardcore gamers/geeks, and the only reason that they have Windows on their computers is because they can't play the video games that they have purchased, such as Battlefield 2142, Unreal Tournament 2004 on Linux unless it is using emulation software such as Wine, etc.
129307
submission
jonsharpie writes:
As time goes by I receive by divine intervention (*cough*) ideas that could change technology! What process would I need to follow to document these ideas and concepts and release these to the public? I personally don't have intentions of developing some of these ideas but rather want to make sure that patent trolls don't get to them first! Is there a public repository that currently exists?
129269
submission
Merry Mace writes:
I have a friend with an older but still quite usable system. Last summer I cleaned up the machine and installed Ubuntu. My friend just told me of a few problems they're having and asked (begged) me to reinstall Windows 98. The question is: Can I ethically install an operating system that I know has some unresolved security flaws?
129133
submission
ruffnsc writes:
I have just started looking for for a job in a new city. Lots of the postings I see say that preference is given to applicants that are local. I have a friend that lives the area that is willing to let me use their address for my resume and other provided information. I feel that in the tech industry my location shouldn't matter as much. I can schedule an interview and fly out as necessary. I realize that I wouldn't get reimbursed for expenses but I'm not worried about that.
What are the community's thoughts?