grind the bones of the dead into banana paste
I'd think that the cause of that tribe dying might be linked to the fact that they had bones made of bananas in the first place.
You can judge a person's behaviour however you like, so sure, why not. You don't have any reason to assume however that (a) that's in any way a bad thing and (b) that you can harass her.
It's a lot less far fetched than judging an entire lab for a particular person choice of clothing and making them responsible of your judgement.
How people dress is part of their behaviour. If people are actively displaying semi-naked pictures of women that in itself is offputting *behaviour*.
By that logic, if a girl is wearing skimpy clothes I am to assume she has a promiscuous behaviour?
this appears to be a very male dominated place where women appear to be treated as things to look at.
Yeah because that's a conclusion that one can come up with after looking at one dude shirt. Seriously, that's pretty much a non-functional and self-alienating way of seeing the world.
Seeing how other people dress and then jumping into conclusions about how it's their behavior based on that is pretty much what feminism criticized in the first place.
then yes she would have found it (a lab head with a shirt emblazoned with nearly naked women on it) very off putting probably to the point of not going there.
So what's the limit then? Should all wear plain shirts because someone can get offended? The ironic thing is that today's womans cloth are full of sassy and snarky remarks most of the time blatantly offensive, and even mysoginistic shit, so this can easily go both ways.
It's idiotic, and actually sexist to repress everyone just because we have to assume that women cannot handle their own feelings to the point of becoming non-competent if they see something that upsets them. Luckily enough most women that I know are way more strong willed than this. Feminism has become really strange lately, they want to perpetrate and enforce the same stereotype they tried to escape all these years.
No, what they are saying is that they are the major contributors, which is actually true. So GTK is catering more and more to THEIR needs. Of course, this being Slashdot we should force their developers do things that WE like, despite us not contributing a single line of code.
I disagree with many of the design principles of the new gnome, but they are not obligated to focus their resources on a path that they don't want to follow. I don't see anyone giving shit to the people at Englihtenment desktop for writing a toolkit (EFL) that looks foreign on any other desktop environment.
Open source used to be about scratching your own itch, not forcing other people to solve your problems. If XFCE/LXDE likes GTK 3 but not in the way gnome devs want, publish patches to GTK3 allowing their code. If their patches are rejected, then we can really talk of gnome devs being a little dickish, but still the solution in that case is forking.
Then again, is easier to complain on the internet than to actually contribute code.
And what problems did you had?
He almost became mainstream.
Progressives (feminists and faggots) started using linux, that's what happened.
Pro-choice hillbilies? the world really has gone mad
, the more talented users turn off to the possiblity of building stable user-facing applications on that platform.
You mean the more vocal slashdot commenters. I don't see developers running away en masse from Red Hat, Canonical or any real development projects.
The anti systemd grup is the linux hipster "my distro is harder than yours" types that has plagued LUGs, IRCs and Mailing Lists from the beginning. It's hardly the majority of developers
They are just a loud bunch, Linux will move forward steadily as it always has. If SystemD is a failure as they said, probably will be replaced in the future by a better thing.
If I wanted no freedom and no choice, then I would just use a more popular commercial OS than Linux and be done with it.
by all means do it, since freedom in free software has nothing to do with your notion of "people should develop things that I LIKE" you are kind of missing the point on the whole thing.
God may be subtle, but he isn't plain mean. -- Albert Einstein