Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 5, Informative) 222

Isn't that lack of dynamic range part of why they were dug up though? That through the loudness war that extra dynamic range...

There's a lot of nuance to the loudness wars, but you're conflating extra dynamic range with dynamic range compression (the exact opposite). Digital (including CDs) can go full square wave -1 dB (you'll likely destroy your speakers, but the media can handle it), but if you did that with a vinyl, if you could even cut the lacquer, plate them, and press the vinyl, the listener's needle would pop out all the time.

A perfectly pressed vinyl would theoretically have a maximum of 70 dB dynamic range. A CD, on the other hand, is 16-bit, which is 96.32 dB maximum dynamic range. For reference, a symphonic orchestra typically has a dynamic range of around 90 dB. There are plenty of comparison videos (IIRC, Red Hot Chili Peppers's Stadium Arcadium was highlighted quite a bit at the time) explaining the difference in the dynamic range compression between vinyl and digital versions, but they weren't typically because of the medium.

It was typically the mastering engineer who did the work, and, for a long time (even sometimes after LUFS [Loudness Units relative to Full Scale] standards were established) artists and (even more often) labels hunted down mastering engineers who would master anything that could hit the radio loud. By virtue of modernization, most stations don't have turntables, so if the label wanted it loud, the artist would often have their preferred mastering engineer do the vinyl. But part of it is even more complicated and boils down to the vinyl engineer working the lathe, which is why different pressings of the same album (even to this day) sound different.

Comment Re:Don't steal, but where's the line? (Score 1) 56

The courts agree with the actor, not you, it seems. The courts use precedence and statute and WAME doesn't seem to be contesting.

Please, point to a court case that isn't the court of public opinion. WAME forfeiting could easily just be them not wanting the bad publicity and/or the legal fight. From my understanding, gavron's statements seem accurate.

Comment Re:ALS + more (Score 1) 50

Good insight, but ALS is relatively rare. In contrast, quadriplegia from neck trauma is common...

Check yourself there. ALS effects, "1 in 250 for men and 1 in 400 for women," (source) meanwhile quadriplegic patients account for, "likely to be some 50 per 100 000 population with about 20 per 100 000 completely paralyzed." (source)

I'd say 1 in 400 is significantly more common than 1 in 5,000, but maybe I can't math.

Comment Today in, I'm not gaslighting! You're gaslighting! (Score 0) 95

But, seriously, I can only think the earliest customers were the only ones who probably didn't think about the data being stored forever. The moment one big data breach occurs, I often think about what data what company might have from me that's at risk and I immediately thought about genetic testing. Not sure which data breach tripped me to that thought (Sony?), but I appreciate it.

Comment Re: didfent apple drop vulkan and opengl? (Score 1) 144

You'd have a point if there were better storefronts for selling Mac games, but there aren't.

Whether there's anything better or not, if there's almost nothing to buy for the Mac, Mac users aren't going to go there. Besides, if you count iOS games (a lot of which run on at least current-generation Macs), one could argue that there are much better storefronts. :-)

There's progress being made. Can't find the source off hand, but I remember reading an article that Apple was subsidizing development costs for Resident Evil 4. That's about the only thing that makes me consider this "push" to actually be a push this time.

Comment Re:I wonder (Score 1) 54

slapping linux on an apple machine maybe did make sense a few decades ago for their early laptops. nowadays there's hardly a point in doing that

I'm friends with some mac users and hearing them complain about ways in which MacOS is failing them tells the opposite story. Flagship features don't work right.

Anecdotal agreement from me. I keep my Mac on the oldest (major) macOS that I can for as long as I can until my software flat out requires me to updated because of the iOSification of the OS. My work machine is a Mac as well and the office keeps it relatively up to date. A lot of the cosmetic changes that Apple have made drive me batty when I have to do anything in the core apps/OS.

Fortunately the Terminal app is still not fucked with.

Comment Re:Serious Business (Score 2) 54

While they've worked to better localize warnings, they're also issuing warnings for a lot more storms, when there's just an indication of rotation on radar (with no way to tell if it has or ever will reach the ground). You reach a point where there's just so many warnings, it's hard to get excited about another one.

I'm assuming you're confusing tornado watches with tornado warnings. Watches mean the conditions are favorable for a tornado. Warnings mean that there has been either a spotting or the radar has flat out showed a tornado proper (source). Watches, I, personally, take with a grain of salt, but when we get warnings (rare as they are in my area [NE Indiana]), I get my pets and I into the basement.

Comment Re:The problem is not Amazon (Score 1) 119

It's a constitutionally mandated service of government while the military is actually not.

Your statement is a bold-faced lie. The post office is not mandated by the US Constitution any more than the military is mandated by the Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 7 merely states that Congress has the power to establish post offices, not that there needs to be one; meanwhile Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 states that Congress has the power to raise armies.

Slashdot Top Deals

You know you've landed gear-up when it takes full power to taxi.

Working...