Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Government efficiency (Score 1) 355

"The downside is that I'm stuck with whatever basic service the government decides is suitable."

And there is the problem with any and all government intervention/rules/regulations/etc. There will be someone (or group of someones) who will be pulling the strings of the government to suit their business/personal interests. Then you will be held accountable (threatened) by an enforced law. On the flip-side, no govt intervention could and does mean, you get one choice. Lump it or leave it.

Somewhere, someday, there will be a balance of govt to business actions. But probably not in my lifetime.

Comment Issues with money... (Score 3, Interesting) 262

" potentially save the DMV some of the $20 million spent each year in postage for renewals."

Why would it safe the DMV money. Isn't that paid for when you pay for the registration anyways as part of the fee/tax?
I have no issue with it, but the savings should be passed to those paying the bills, not for the govt to keep. But they love taking and keeping our money.

Comment Re:What now? (Score 1) 1073

Say you have a same-sex marriage in a state that recognizes it or a country that recognizes it. Now you move to Alabama. Are you unmarried? And can Alabama still discriminate against your marriage? Or does this just apply to the federal government?

This is where States rights come in and the Federal governments rights stop. Well, it used to be that way. Because of Federal dollars luring the States to follow what the Federal govt wants done, States rights are becoming fewer and fewer.

Comment Re:This is the best way of gun control (Score 1) 656

Good analogy. So, let's put the same restrictions on guns like we do on automobiles here in the U.S. You know, registration is required, licenses are required, insurance is required. In some states, an inspection is required. How does all that work for you?

I'm not an avid hunter, but a license is required. Also, to carry a weapon, again a license is required (unless it's outlawed by a particular State). To purchase a gun, registration/background check is required. You don't actually think that the local, state, and federal governments would miss out on an opportunity to require licenses and collect those taxes so you can go enjoy a nice skeet shoot do you?

Where do people get the idea that you can get a gun as easily getting a candy bar from a machine?

And last time I checked, you don't have to have a license to actually purchase a used vehicle. However, you will need a license to register said purchased vehicle to be able to use it on the public roads. However, if I only use the vehicle on my property, I do not have to register the vehicle. But that is a state by state decision.

Comment Re:This is the best way of gun control (Score 1) 656

However, a significant difference between cars and guns: cars provide a heck of a lot more than 50% more useful functionality to society than guns, so they're perhaps "worth" slightly more carnage. Which would cause more problems: all the guns in the country spontaneously jamming and failing to fire, or all the cars in the country breaking down?

Oh I don't know....Every time I bite into a juicy steak, I thank the gun that put that killed that cow quickly.

Comment Re:Terrorist or freedom fighter? (Score 0) 1109

Just because someone has Islam on his facebook page doesn't make him an Islamic terrorist. Were all the school shootings in the states Christian terrorists (Crusaders?) because they had Christian on their facebook page?

We don't currently know what the brother's motivations were. Perhaps it was do with Chechen independence. Perhaps it was to do with religion. Perhaps they are just mentally ill individuals with an axe to grind with their local community. We don't know at the moment.

Just like the newtown nut case doesn't represent gun owners? Or that the nut case abortion doctor in Philly doesn't represent pro-choice?

Comment Re:Looking forward (Score 2) 154

If you are young and briliant you have a choice, help the world or help yourself and become filthy rich. Of course choosing the second leaves the option of later forming a massive foundation to help other people make the world a better place than you would if you chose the "good" option. And you still got to be rich.

Being young and brilliant (being savvy, lucky, brutal, and hardworking could be confused with brilliant I guess) you get to carry that 'brilliance' with you throughout your life. Now he's made a lot of money (though not his real goal, he just wants to be the winner), and being smart, what is one to do with all that money and be considered a winner throughout history? Let me see......how about starting a charitable foundation, that he controls, get the tax benefits, be able to pass along all of that power to whomever he chooses without the death tax, and be deemed a savior by all man kind. He has not and will not just give away all of his winnings.

Say what you will, he's still a vicious person who always wants to win at all costs. I don't hate him, but thinking that he somehow has seen the light is quite naive.

Slashdot Top Deals

If the aborigine drafted an IQ test, all of Western civilization would presumably flunk it. -- Stanley Garn

Working...