Frankly, if you're considered cunning or sly, well it probably ain't so.

Don't beat yourself up over perfectly normal sexuality. (no pun intended)

Just goes to show you that they still hate science. People don't want you to be smart, they want the benefits of having smart people, but they will NEVER like nor RESPECT you.

Shill! You're attempting to generate piracy and it shows.

I've discovered artificial intelligence should I google what to do next? :D

I can only write summaries. Clear, concise, contextual, executive summaries, or drivelized communication anxiety type sludge.

Not big on logic are you?

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaughter#United_States_Law_2

2. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/promoting-hope-preventing-suicide/201006/making-them-feel-not-alone

3. http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1677546&cid=32483118

I understand where you're coming from, but I do not like where you're going. The only resolution for your demands is to completely remove our soldier's ability to initiate combat entirely, which as shown by the video already required several authorizations and confirmations before they went ahead. The appearance was even that the enemy had fired and was getting ready to fire, so even saying that the enemy must fire first does not live up to these standards.

I'm sorry, but barring severe disability, childlike naivety, or plain insanity everyone that goes towards a combat zone in order to accomplish an objective within the combat zone damn well ought to evaluate those risks before achieving that objective. Bridges and buildings have a pretense of safety, an obligation to humanity to operate in a manner which is not grossly negligent or predatory. Soldiers, armies, combat zones, etc. function without any such pretense, in fact, the context is so fundamentally opposed that I cannot understand why nobody has pursued Reuters for providing inadequate training for an employee given an incredibly hazardous task.

Now, I'm not saying that nobody should be punished, but I cant see any cause for legal liability, not by that video alone. Find a policy or procedure they did not follow and you might have something, but that video does not present anything blatantly negligent.

Yup, "human" failure and if you really, really believe that you could never make this sort of mistake then you need a whole boatload of pills.

"this single statement belies the truth of the situation"
Okay, let's hear it, elaborate, put it down for realz homie cause the rest of the fucking world would like to know "The Truth" of the fucking situation you fucking fuckwit.

Thanks, but I'll have none of your madness, I've got plenty of the shit myself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CollateralMurder.ogv

Jeeze, you're a douche. I'll tell you, if I was a psychotic asshole looking to pick people off for shits and giggles the very last people I would fsck with would be reporters, it's kind of the same thing with serial killers targeting hookers, you're not trying to get caught. This was an accident, a tragedy, but not intentional as far as I can tell.

You better not be talkin' bout my kin again.

Yea, it sounds good, but it limits the bug testing. Suddenly, your beta testers are testing the latest adobe update as well as service pack 3.