Comment No matter what you do (Score 1) 248
A "friend" might comment on your condition and upload your photo as well.
A "friend" might comment on your condition and upload your photo as well.
Google could never get rid of the URL entirely
If there's one thing I've learned with software never say never.
They could implement a service that sends the URL you want to Google first then Google fires back with the "chip" and only the "chip".
My first thought is this sounds ripe for exploit.
NSA compliance continues.
WASHINGTON — A federal judge has dismissed the Federal Aviation Administration’s only fine against a commercial drone user on the grounds that the small drone was no different than a model aircraft, a decision that appears to undermine the agency’s power to keep a burgeoning civilian drone industry out of the skies.
Patrick Geraghty, a National Transportation Safety Board administrative law judge, said in his order dismissing the $10,000 fine that the FAA has no regulations governing model aircraft flights or for classifying model aircraft as an unmanned aircraft.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/ru...
WASHINGTON — A federal judge has dismissed the Federal Aviation Administration’s only fine against a commercial drone user on the grounds that the small drone was no different than a model aircraft, a decision that appears to undermine the agency’s power to keep a burgeoning civilian drone industry out of the skies.
Patrick Geraghty, a National Transportation Safety Board administrative law judge, said in his order dismissing the $10,000 fine that the FAA has no regulations governing model aircraft flights or for classifying model aircraft as an unmanned aircraft.
Why does anyone use Yahoo? You can't get an email without giving up your cell number, their "answers" section is absurd, they really have nothing to offer IMO.
There are far better choices, it seems like a recently beheaded chicken, still running around on autonomic pilot.
Is take a deep breath and enjoy it because if nano particle, tech, wire, and what not becomes main stream we will all have to wear expensive mask to breath or live in sealed domes.
All tiny tech of this nature is an anathema to lungs and various other body parts.
The really good news is if this gets adopted all the other tape products will drop in cost.
Maybe something proven like mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO) then we can all don our black tennis shoes and board the mother ship.
The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" implies an adversarial, polemic, or combative debate, and creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument, ("knock down a straw man,") instead of the original proposition.[3][4]
Grow the fuck up.
The range I go to has a ban board, ~60% of the banned names are police, police routinely accidentally discharge their weapons because they carry them everyday and "familiarity breeds contempt".
Your reasoning is if a person can't check their batteries/watch they shouldn't carry a gun, my reasoning is "why add another point of failure to something you may depend on for your life".
I submit that your reasoning actually shows you're the one that shouldn't be allowed a weapon, because you have an unrealistic assessment of life and human behavior made from a soft chair in front of a computer.
Therefore you can't be expected to make the correct decision come shooting time.
How about a gun with no electronics, I know what my pistol can do right now or a month from now without checking it, because I maintain the weapon, I know whether it's ready to go or not without a daily check.
Why add another point of failure to something you may depend on for your life, only incompetent people think that's a good idea.
Someone else said: "So your argument consists of "I'm not competent enough to perform maintenance on a firearm"." and I would add to that "store your weapon", after all how did someone else or "your son" get a hold of it if you weren't incompetent and leaving it out for that to happen?
I'm trying to come up with an explanation that makes realistic and consistent assumptions about the stupidity of the buying public
Well let me save you the trouble, stupidity defies realistic and consistent assumptions, as Einstein said "Two things are infinite: the Universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the Universe.”
If the aborigine drafted an IQ test, all of Western civilization would presumably flunk it. -- Stanley Garn
