Comment Re:4 real issues (Score 1) 189
the 3GS can handle encryption and if you have exchange 2007 SP1 you can force the phone to encrypt the data which means any pre-3GS devices won't work
the 3GS can handle encryption and if you have exchange 2007 SP1 you can force the phone to encrypt the data which means any pre-3GS devices won't work
Design always implies a designer, so evolutionary design is always a religious reference. He communicated perfectly, but I'm not sure if he communicated what he intended.
and google probably has an email system where everything is stored in Gmail in the cloud. for the rest of us, we have exchange and people store a lot of data on phones
4GB vs 16GB or 32GB storage
by the time you add more storage to the N1 it's more expensive. and it pretty much locked down to T-Mo since it can't use AT&T's 3G frequencies. and T-Mo sucks. and with all the corporate/work related apps in the app store Google's limit on the number of apps is dumb.
Perhaps he wanted to know who would be on the board. Shuttleworth? Markting drones? The existing members? Users? Me?
Loads of phones could do that, and even better, some of them would be cheaper.
For one, you would probably read more books
One of these days I want someone to explain to me why reading more books is so important. Not everything that isn't reading books is bad (take that grammar nazis).
I object to this for a different reason: I consider the concept of an organization with world jurisdiction intrinsically dangerous and unacceptable. It's like a monopoly: if you don't like their rules, where else are you going to go?
What do you sugest then? And no, i'm not trying to flame. and no, I am also not talking about piracy?
Cyber crime in my book.
- Web sites are taken off line due to denial of service attacks.
- identifies are stolen and sold. Costing people their credit and sometimes their homes, their lives
Something has to be done, and at least this(as bad as it is) is a united(least it sounds like it) front. All countries need to be part of the solution for us to win this, which no matter how you look at it. Will be a solution like is described here.
Again, not trying to flame. Just trying to point out the stakes involved require a solution like this.
Or do you really believe they would develop something less secure?
It's not a matter of belief. Those who are paying attention know this is worse.
The problem, as I see it, is that this 'Cloud', although free, is the public face of cloud computing for many, and thus the one that many people will base their opinions on. Who would put their neck on the line suggesting 'Clouds' to their boss, co-workers, etc. as good, when apparently items can vanish at will, whether it be by man or machine? Even though the paid version would likely have better support, possibly less 'censorship', few people will be likely to make that distinction.
It is better to live rich than to die rich. -- Samuel Johnson