Comment Re:Implementation (Score 1) 429
I agree on the common ground aspect.
I'd add that when the story summary on slashdot is incomplete, someone usually reads the article and posts a better summary, gets modded up, and discussion moves on from there.
Most big media outlets will not let you criticise their summary. They usually post short-term rubbish to attract clicks and do advertising revenue. They often use misleading headlines and poor context. Not much of a surprise that the discussion afterwards goes nowhere.
Ideally, I do secretly wish that online discussions could be more similar to a real roundtable. It's very difficult to summarise a slashdot discussion. After 24-48h, it just kind of slows down and we move to something new and shiny. In a roundtable, a moderator usually tries to re-state the divergences of opinion to get a good understanding of the various positions. Otherwise it's just the same people repeating the same thing with different words. "Slashbacks" (something like that?), a while ago, kind of tried to do that, I guess, but they were done by slashdot editors.