Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment After Warning People For 30 Years... (Score 2, Insightful) 122

I think we're entitled to laugh at these people.

That "heat belt" is exactly the same shape as states that have voted for Republicans and climate change denial for the last 30 years.

You have been warned about this.

You were told it was coming. You were told it was going to be bad. You were told that it was going to cause disruption to your lives. That it would cause famine, disease and plagues. You were told that you had time to turn it around, but it was going to be costly.

But no.

No, you didn't want to spend any money on the problem. No, you didn't want to even acknowledge that the problem was real! Instead it was a hoax, it was blue politics, it was a fraud, a sham, a ploy by communists to turn us all into Birkenstock-wearing, tree-hugging, Quorn-eating, long-haired hippies.

Or even better, your Invisible Sky Fairy and his Magical Comeback Kid were going to come down from the sky and kiss it better.

So you'll have to excuse those of us who are leaving those "heat belt" states, when we start laughing our butts off and denying you federal aid.

Comment What Everyone Gets Wrong About Crypto (Score 1) 48

It is a currency.

It is not an investment product. It gets treated like one, but it's not supposed to be. That's not it's function.

It is meant to be exchanged for goods and services. Yes, it will have some value, as all fiat currency does, because it's meant to have value. But it is not supposed to be sitting in a hard drive.

The whole fraud and scheme aspect of ALL cryptocurrencies stems from that one problem: nobody wants to use their currency.

What might be an interesting way to solve this problem, is to add a timer function to the blockchain, where each coin starts to depreciate after it's generated, and the only way to rejuvenate it's value is to spend it. So long as it keeps moving, it's value will be retained. Anyone hoarding it will lose money.

Submission + - SPAM: Han Solo's Blaster From the Original 'Star Wars' Is Going Up for Auction

schwit1 writes: The blaster that helped the Rebel Alliance finally take down the Empire could soon be yours.

Han Solo’s DL-44 Heavy Blaster Pistol from the original Star Wars trilogy will be sold next month by Rock Island Auction Company. The weapon isn’t just a lovingly crafted replica, either. It’s the actual prop that was wielded by Harrison Ford on the set of the original film in the franchise, 1977’s A New Hope.

Han shot first

Link to Original Source

Submission + - Covid learning loss has been a global disaster (economist.com)

schwit1 writes:

When covid-19 first began to spread around the world, pausing normal lessons was a forgivable precaution. No one knew how transmissible the virus was in classrooms; how sick youngsters would become; or how likely they would be to infect their grandparents. But disruptions to education lasted long after encouraging answers to these questions emerged.

New data suggest that the damage has been worse than almost anyone expected. Locking kids out of school has prevented many of them from learning how to read properly. Before the pandemic 57% of ten-year-olds in low and middle-income countries could not read a simple story, says the World Bank. That figure may have risen to 70%, it now estimates. The share of ten-year-olds who cannot read in Latin America, probably the worst-affected region, could rocket from around 50% to 80% (see chart 1).

Children who never master the basics will grow up to be less productive and to earn less. McKinsey, a consultancy, estimates that by 2040 education lost to school closures could cause global gdp to be 0.9% lower than it would otherwise have been—an annual loss of $1.6trn. The World Bank thinks the disruption could cost children $21trn in earnings over their lifetimes—a sum equivalent to 17% of global gdp today. That is much more than the $10trn it had estimated in 2020, and also an increase on the $17trn it was predicting last year.


Comment Re:Settlements and Undisclosed Nonsense (Score 1) 68

There is a machine sitting in a room.

That machine has all kinds of signs, warnings, labels, flashing lights, loud klaxxons, beepers, buzzers and whoopers. The moment you come within 10 feet, the lights start flashing. A little closer, the buzzers go off. Closer, and the klaxxons go off in the whole building.

All around the machine are blood spatters, bits of rotting flesh, shreds of clothing, and a few formerly internal and now distressingly external organs, as well as thick clouds of flies, and seething mats of squirming maggots.

Inside the machine is $100,000,000. In order to get the money, you have to stick your hand in the machine. You have a 10% chance of successfully getting the money, a 40% chance of getting nothing and being unharmed, and a 50% chance of having the machine grab you and reduce you to giblets.

Not too bad, right?

Well, if your luck fails, then everyone in the building shares your fate, and gets shredded to giblets.

Hence the reason for all the alarms, buzzers, lights and klaxxons. If some idiot is stupid enough to have a go, then at least everyone else in the building has the opportunity to either run for it, or better yet, run to the room and beat the tar out of the idiot who's putting everyone at risk.

That's the logic here: make it far too expensive and destructive to be a bad actor. Make the consequences so horrific, that *everyone* in the company is highly motivated to report bad actors the moment they find them. If everyone is going to lose their job, because the head of accounting decided to sign people up for expensive accounts without their knowledge, then everyone is going to make it their business to know about it. And the incentive to report them right away is very high.

Now, it's reasonable to say this kind of punishment regimen doesn't work for things like assault, murder or other associated crimes of passion, so it won't work here? But theft is not a crime of passion. And corporate wrongdoing is nothing at all like a psychological problem like kleptomania. Corporate wrongdoing is entirely calculated and premeditated. Those involved and making the money know exactly what they are doing, and what the penalties are, but the dollar signs in their eyes are bigger than the paddle.

Right now, the logic is geared in the opposite direction.

Your chances of getting caught are low, your chances of being prosecuted are even lower, and the chances of an actual conviction are lower than that. But the rewards of being a greedy little turd are ridiculously high, as are the rewards of having others join in, rather than report you.

Comment Settlements and Undisclosed Nonsense (Score 4, Insightful) 68

The problem is that it's simply more profitable to screw people over, than it is to not screw them over. Corporate tort reform and caps on penalties means the justice system has no teeth.

I have never been a fan of tort reform. We need to change things up a bit.

You want to settle out of court? Okay. But you have to agree to pay 50% more than you would have faced in court. Hush money should be expensive. And you can't declare Chapter 11 or 13. Pay up or your company goes into plain old bankruptcy, and it gets chopped up and the pieces get tossed into the market to pay off your debts and obligations, and your investors get whatever is left.

You want to take it to court? Okay. But the penalties should be tied to the profits of the company in question. You made 5.2 billion this year? Well, you made that money while engaging in wrong-doing. Therefore that entire year of profits is forfeit. And you still have to pay taxes on it, too.

Oh, and just one more thing?

When you lose the case, the company should pay the full amount right up front. The accountants should be in the courtroom, ready to transfer the money. If you want to appeal, then the money gets transferred to an escrow.

The bottom line is that the company is required to fork over the money right then and there. If they win the appeal, then it can be given back. But in the meantime, the existing leadership and board of directors can be exsanguinated by the investors for costing them so much money.

Submission + - Code bloat has become astronomical (positech.co.uk) 3

Artem S. Tashkinov writes: An indie game programmer Cliff Harris shares his concerns about the current state of compute: Code bloat sounds like something that grumpy old programmers in their fifties (like me) make a big deal out of, because we are grumpy and old and also grumpy. I get that. But us being old and grumpy means complaining when code runs 50% slower than it should, or is 50% too big. This is way, way, way beyond that. We are at the point where I honestly do believe that 99.9% of the code in files on your PC is absolutely useless and is never even executed. Its just there, in a suite of 65 DLLS, all because some coder wanted to do something trivial, like save out a bitmap and had *no idea how easy that is*, so they just imported an entire bucketful of bloatware to achieve it.

Like I say, I really should not be annoyed at young programmers doing this. Its what they learned. They have no idea what high performance or constraint-based development is. When you tell them the original game Elite had a sprawling galaxy, space combat in 3D, a career progression system, trading and thousands of planets to explore, and it was 64k, I guess they HEAR you, but they don’t REALLY understand the gap between that, and what we have now.

Computers are so fast these days that you should be able to consider them absolute magic. Everything that you could possibly imagine should happen between the 60ths of a second of the refresh rate. And yet, when I click the volume icon on my microsoft surface laptop (pretty new), there is a VISIBLE DELAY as the machine gradually builds up a new user interface element, and eventually works out what icons to draw and has them pop-in and they go live. It takes ACTUAL TIME. I suspect a half second, which in CPU time, is like a billion fucking years.

Submission + - Are 'Google Programmers' the New 'Next-Next-Finish Programmers'? 3

theodp writes: Back in 1998, Ellen Ullman wrote in Salon about The dumbing-down of programming: "My programming tools were full of wizards. Little dialog boxes waiting for me to click "Next" and "Next" and "Finish." Click and drag and shazzam! — thousands of lines of working code. No need to get into the "hassle" of remembering the language. No need to even learn it. It is a powerful siren-song lure: You can make your program do all these wonderful and complicated things, and you don't really need to understand."

Twenty-four years later, PVS-Studio has published a translation of Ivan Belokamentsev's cautionary tale of how modernizing his interviewing process from coding on paper to a computer led him to inadvertently hire 'Google Programmers', who dazzled him in interviews and initially on the job, but soon reached a plateau in productivity that puzzled him until he had a gobsmacking realization:

"It was like somebody hit me on the head with a sack of flour. It took me about two days to process it. How is it really possible? The beautiful, well-optimized code they showed me at the first interview was from the Internet. The explosive growth of productivity in the first months was due to the solutions that they found on the Internet. Those answers to user questions after the magic "We'll call you back" from these guys — were found on the Internet. They were coding without understanding the basic constructs. No, they didn't write code — they downloaded it. No, that's not it, either. To download the code is like running "npm i", it's ok. They copy-pasted the code. Without knowing how to write it. That's what angered me – what the...? Well, I understand when you surf the net to figure out how a new technology works. Or when you need to use some exotic feature and not to bloat your head with unnecessary information. But basic things! How can you copy-paste basic things from the Internet?! Do you want to know what they said? "What's the big deal?" I was ready to join the monastery out of grief. I took a break, stopped talking to them, retreated into myself, and started thinking. Of course, I realized that it was not about them. I was the problem. They only followed the laws of their own world. And I was the fool for not seeing these laws — I did not understand them, did not realize their seriousness. The seriousness of superficiality."

Comment Ever Grab A Spark Plug Wire? (Score 1) 227

Have you ever grabbed a spark plug wire while the engine was running? Or being cranked?

Most people will only do it once.

Not because it's harmful, but because it grabs ahold of one entire side of your body and snaps you like a bullwhip. After you stop doing the tippy-taps dance, you take a breath and go grab the insulated pliers like you should have the first time.

Some people are slow learners, and they might even do it a second or third time, but almost never a fourth.

If you do that with plasma wires, there isn't going to be a next time.

Submission + - Elon Musk demands all Tesla employees to come back to the office or "quit" (electrek.co)

waspleg writes: Here are the emails in full:

First email:

        Subject: Remote work is no longer acceptble

        Anyone who wishes to do remote work must be in the office for a minimum (and I mean *minimum*) of 40 hours per week or depart Tesla. This is less than we ask of factory workers.

        If there are particularly exceptional contributors for whom this is impossible, I will review and approve those exceptions directly.

        Moreover, the “office” must be a main Tesla office, not a remote branch office unrelated to the job duties, for example being responsible for Fremont factory human relations, but having your office be in another state.

        Thanks,
        Elon

Second email:

        Subject: To be super clear

        Everyone at Tesla is required to spend a minimum of 40 hours in the office per week. Moreover, the office must be where your actual colleagues are located, not some remote pseudo office. If you don’t show up, we will assume you have resigned.

        The more senior you are, the more visible must be your presence. That is why I lived in the factory so much – so that those on the line could see me working alongside them. If I had not done that, Tesla would long ago have gone bankrupt.

        There are of course companies that don’t require this, but when was the last time they shipped a great new product? It’s been a while.

        Tesla has and will create and actually manufacture the most exciting and meaningful products of any company on Earth. This will not happen by phoning it in.

        Thanks,
        Elon

Comment I've Had Gastric Bypass Surgery (Score 4, Funny) 126

It's helped me to lose a lot of weight, and has greatly improved my overall health!

But it also means I fart like a cow in heat.

And due to some slight complications during recovery, I developed an anal fissure, and needed a sphincterotomy. Consequently, my farts no longer sound normal. Instead of the blase midline treble and pitiful bass, my backside now produces the black-tarred glutterings of an angry Servitor of the Outer Gods.

And I intend to share my Chthonian Paeans of Darkness and Despair with everyone in the office.

And if management complains, then I'll point out that because of the surgery that saved my life, I no longer have control over such things.

Slashdot Top Deals

Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.

Working...