Has anyone actually proven that carbon offset actually do anything beneficial? All the items I have seen from various global warming groups is they are nice to have people focus on what they call a problem but overall are a distraction.
If you want to see something really interesting compare the following groups and see what they charge to plant a tree:
1) Arbor Day Foundation
2) TREE AID
3) A carbon offset company, like Al Gores.

And part of that is because of the cute name, Butter Fish sells better than Wart Perch.
Also people know more about obamacare than ACA.
The people pushing the use of ACA do so to pull the blanket over the eyes of the people.

Change of that 0.
However I am expecting to see snowden standing next to Putin waving at the crowds during the opening ceremony.

It was a glitch because it affects the peons. Besides if Apple had all the problems this system did they would of been crucified in the newspapers and everywhere else.

Do you mean like they did back in March of this year?
No that would not be fair since it requires a high level of standard to remove parts of the US Constitution then to defund some other law. Now if the democrats wanted to add an amendment that had both gun control and a budget portion go for it.

As the number of books for a title go down some software, be it amazon or the sellers, automaticcly increases the prices. So for that book there could just not be many people selling it.
When you get a book like that the best place to check is ebay. When I was recently throwing out my old books I had a few books that amazon placed in the $100 range and ebay had a bunch at $.10; did not think that a 3rd edition of a management book that was currently near edition 20 would be of that much value.

There were two studies earlier this year that found the reason.
1) The USA has alot of children having children and there is a better chance of the baby having problems and dieing. The USA counts birth from the first breath of the baby which is not used by other countries. This and the death rate from illegal people have babies really brings down the USA overall life exceptacy.
2) The USA leads the world in accidents and young people performing possible life threating activities. However the reports pointed out if have an life threating accident or something else you are more likely to live if you make it to a USA hospital.

You do know that according to the vast majority of reputable scientists both of those items are extermely safe and self-regulation has work.

How where they caught?

WHich law are you talking about the early 1970s law where the USPS said they would take over the obligations and save monies to pay for peoples retirements or the 2006 law that came about because they where not saving money with which they would need to pay people retirement in a few more years and required them to build up the fund so they could meet their obligations?

Please stop repeating this lie, granted it is repeated enough on alot of hate sites. For you it was probably a mistake since you did not know the truth.
Congress want to protect the taxpayer from having to take over the duties that the USPS said they would do, the postmaster general and the postal unions want to make the taxpayers pay for thier poor management and keep things as they are.
The postal accountability law requires the USPS to actually do some proper financial management and dropping it would not make them competative again; even ignore the money they owe for this they would of lost money for the last couple of years. Without the money set aside they would not be able the meet the obligations they agreeed to back in the 1970s and the people who retiring now would not have the monies that they are suppose to get.
Privatization would solve nothing of this since the obligations would follow the person who purchased the company.
BTW the 75 years is number of years that for ACCOUNTING purposes they have to figure future liabilities. It is NOT how long they have to fund benefits. That 75 years of accounting is followed by the DoD, social security, department of Housing, etc.

No, you the receiver can make the decisions.

Software like this is old, even Microsoft sell software with similar options.

Instead of using the normal mail you have to you their software. Since the email only unencrypts in that software it can control how long it is kept, if you can forward it, if you can save it, etc. So unless you do screen captures if the sender only wants you to be able read it once that is all the software is going to allow you to do.

The best explanation I have seen is that Ryanair is an experiment to see what people will do for cheap plane tickets.

You want to know how the lawyers got the temperature they said the coffee should of been served at?
They went around to places that sold sell coffee and then took the average of them.

The Pope gave him a chance to prove his idea and he could not. It was when he would not stop saying that the main scientific thinking of the day, based on the works of Aristotle, were wrong that he got house arrest.
Before you complain about that it is very much around today present the same amount of scientific research against a popular mainstream thinking and the scientist of today will call for you to be fired and blacklisted.