Comment Re:What? (Score 1) 131
You've never encountered "trigger warnings"?
Trigger warning: the hero dies at the end.
You've never encountered "trigger warnings"?
Trigger warning: the hero dies at the end.
The programmers need to design a digital Bretton Woods system and enforce a stable exchange rate. For instance, the value of one eMark could be pegged at one five hundredth of a bitcoin, and the various central banks would be obligated to buy and sell bitcoins and emarks at that rate. That way, a miner wouldn't have to worry about backing the wrong computations.
What chemicals spilled, other than all the radioactive water?
And since when have people not been interested in the effects of chemical spills, genetic or otherwise?
By not studying the narrow strip of land that was affected by the tsunami.
Bah, you're making the radical assumption that scientists have a clue about the things they study.
Yes, if there's a reactor meltdown in your neighborhood you should stay put and ignore the panic mongers. A little radiation never did anything.
No, my life would have been changed (i.e., ended in the cosmic collapse) if I *had* hit him.
The speed of light is a limit on how fast you can accelerate something *in* space, but it's not a limit on how fast space can expand.
In fact you can't even state the rate of expansion of space as a velocity, because the velocity apparent as the speed of recession depends on how far away you're looking.
It has a psychological effect because ignorant economists use limited knowledge about the universe to justify austerity policies. Friedman using TANSTAAFL, for example. Except now Dark Energy violates TANSTAAFL, and it didn't hold in General Relativity anyway. So we suffer from an artificially imposed scarcity of money because economists suffer from a lack of knowledge about the universe.
That's not rigorous enough for physics, but I do believe it meets the standards for good economics.
This is all hogwash.
At least that much of your theory is correct.
God is the fundamental reason for why the universe didn't became a black hole in the early stages after the Big Bang
I can stated with equal evidence and authority that the stray cat I almost ran over yesterday is the fundamental reason for why the universe didn't become a black hole in the early stages after the Big Bang.
Be glad I missed him.
Ok, let's hear it.
[clears throat] "the stray cat I almost ran over yesterday is the fundamental reason for why the universe didn't become a black hole in the early stages after the Big Bang."
So to extrapolate from the TFA: The laws of physics do not exist in a vacuum...
There's a difference between 'a vacuum' and 'nothing'.
All your files have been destroyed (sorry). Paul.