Yep, "it idles" woohoo!
Not only that but the parts I saw being modeled and printed were low-stress components such as the stand (wow!) and the exhaust tube.
Were the compressor and turbine wheels printed? Those are the crucial parts and the ones exposed to maximum stress.
A great proof of concept but they tell us that this was made using materials "not available to the hobby industry" so why does it perform so poorly, especially since they claim to have enhanced the design.
I smell marketing department hype here
The SEC is going after them for things they did to the investment market.
Exactly. The SEC couldn't care less about the students. But if enough investors make sufficient noise, they act. Next we'll hear how ITT was an isolated example.
There's plenty more scam schools where ITT came from.
Yeah, I watermark my videos but on several occasions these script-kiddies have copied my *entire* channel -- every single video!
In that case I can't see any upside to what they're doing
And in those cases I had filed over 24 copyright strikes against each channel -- and all that YouTube did was remove each video as I flagged it -- but the channels were still operating -- until several weeks later -- after I had *laboriously* filed even more complaints about the remaining videos. That's a hell of a lot of work so I ask again... what happened to the 3-strikes policy in such cases?
What's a "3rd party block"???
That's what Google *claim* but, as I mentioned in a previous post, there are some channels against which I've filed up to a *dozen* copyright complaints against and they're still there -- still carrying content for which they do not have copyright (ie: stuff from other channels they've downloaded and then re-uploaded without permission.
They seem *VERY* selective about when they actually enforce their copyright strikes in my experience.
Here's another of the script-generated channels that are being created by downloading and re-uploading other people's popular YouTube videos
Now you *KNOW* that this channel has been generated by a download/re-upload script and people will file copyright complaints but chances are that it will still be there in a month's time and by then the videos will have been monetized and earning the script-user a small but useful amount of cash -- money that should have been going into the pockets of the original creators/uploaders.
And here's another one that is already monetizing other people's re-uploaded videos: Kasandra Sahr.
Where's the "three strikes" policy now?
And why hasn't YouTube automatically flagged new channels that upload large numbers of videos within a few hours -- because most people don't do that -- only scripts do that.
And how are they going to collect this GST from overseas companies?
There's no way to ensure that every mom and pop online business selling digital media/games over the Net into Australia will comply with a "request" from the Aussie government (because they have no legal power to force them) to collect GST on their behalf for free.
Will they be asking credit card companies to automatically levy the GST on overseas purchases? If they do then they're opening a pandora's box that they really ought to keep closed.
I could see Bitcoin getting a new lease of life for Aussies
As a regular YouTube uploader and "Channel Partner", I often find my videos have been copied and re-uploaded (with monetization) by "pirates".
There are now obviously scripts out there that can be run to automatically create a new channel which consists of nothing but re-uploads of other people's popular videos.
On countless occasions I have laboriously filled out YT's copyright complaint form, listing a dozen or more instances where a single channel has pilfered my hard work. I always get the standard response "the offending content has been removed" -- but the channels are often still operating. What happened to the "three strikes" for copyright infringement?
And just as importantly... since *my* videos were clearly being leveraged by someone else to generate revenue... what happens to that money?
I bet Google still charges the advertiser but no doubt they won't be paying the pirate -- so do they just pocket this money without the need to pay a share to the genuine copyright holder? It would seem so.
This probably explains why they have made NO EFFORT at all to circumvent these script-created channels that contain nothing but other people's content re-uploaded in clear violation of YouTube's Terms of Service.
What an earner for Google -- no wonder they don't bother enforcing their "three strikes" policy on channels for which they effectively get to keep *ALL* the ad revenues and no wonder they don't flag (for inspection) new channels which suddenly appear and upload several hundred videos within 24 hours.
Do no evil? Yeah... right!
We can be tracked with decimeter precision. Yay. I'm sure it won't be used against us. Carry on.
"One Architecture, One OS" also translates as "One Egg, One Basket".