Actually, the second bomb and the threat of 9 more produced "peace".
Many have suggested that the second bomb brought hostilities to a close a day or two earlier than would otherwise have happened. It was taking the Japanese a while to get their heads around the problem of not being invincible.
Others have suggested it was removing the clause to indict the Emperor for war crimes (and instead leave him be head of state) from the conditions of surrender that let the Japanese allow to surrender without losing face.
If you poke a bear cub with a stick long enough, its mom might come and maul the shit out of you.
Yeah... you do know that bears are not people, right? We generally try to hold Muslims to higher standards than we do bears.
Or Pro-Lifers. Yes, all of them, because all Muslims raided Charlie Hebdo.
>. If the trap captures the first ant, it won't be able to capture many more ants later.
I wish all people were as smart as this plant.
I hope more people would be so smart as not to listen to life tips by people who accredit "smarts" to a plant. That's just bananas.
You might like the second sentence of the article:
things that were new to x86 were old hat to supercomputing, mainframe, and workstation folks.
Just curious, did you read one sentence of the article before commenting on it?
At least he didn't stop at "asked" and immediately fired off a diatribe against Ask Slashdot.
The sea level rise is probably the best thing to talk about. From what I've seen of the data, we're looking at about 2 mm per year throughout most of the world right now. At that rate, we're looking at about 7 inches per 100 years. At that rate, it is hard to argue we have a problem.
Yeah it's really hard to argue with someone who ignores that the sea level rise is accelerating and pretends he can do linear extrapolation. An easy way to tell it's accelerating is that the actual rise is 3 mm / year, not your old value.
Nature has been known to sometimes print dodgy articles, so you'll need to get more verification before making a claim, search for "Nature magazine controversies"
It's not so much that the article is dodgy, more that what Tony Wazzup tells him the article says is dodgy. Which is a total surprise. Not.
Something isn't right here. Google can and does patch older versions of Android via the Play store app, which can patch the system.
That only can patch APIs, not anything in the kernel. The only thing not right here is your Fandroidish "Google can do no wrong".
Funny, this article is by a climate scientist.
Karmashock is just trying to misdirect by pointing fingers at unrelated political arguments to create FUD and guilt by association. All of which are decidedly political tactics.
"Advice"...? Not so much.
Well, his advice is to tell people you love guns. Maybe Mann should just threaten to shoot some deniers to change their minds?
Oops, forgot to add:
talk to someone that wins. Talk to Bill Clinton.
Bubba torpedoed Hillary's last campaign. He's not a winner anymore.
-jcr
LOL are you really sure about that ?
I am pretty sure it keeps him the winner in his home, and about the last thing he wants is a president Hillary.
Why - that would be the best way to keep her off his back.
Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it.