Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime

Silk Road 2.0 Deputy Arrested 126

An anonymous reader writes With the Ulbricht trial ongoing in a case over the original Silk Road, Homeland Security agents have made another arrest in the Silk Road 2.0 case more than two and a half months after the site was shut down. This time they arrested Brian Richard Farrell who went by the moniker "DoctorClu." From the article: "Homeland Security agents tracked Silk Road 2.0 activity to Farrell's Bellevue home in July, according to an affidavit by Special Agent Michael Larson. In the months that followed, agents watched his activities and interviewed a roommate who said Farrell received UPS, FedEx and postal packages daily. One package was found to contain 107 Xanax pills, Larson said. That led to a search on Jan. 2 that recovered computers, drug paraphernalia, silver bullion bars worth $3,900, and $35,000 in cash, Larson said."

Comment Re:And let me guess... (Score 1) 290

Sadly, two out of three is pretty good.

The government has gotten so far with the terrorist thing that Congress had to have a hearing investigating why Congress had two previous hearings about whether the American Muslim community is a terrorist threat to national security and what they should do about them (remember FDR putting all the Japs and Krauts in concentration camps?). The pedophile-childporn angle is working so well we can't get proper care for these people: in Europe, broad-age-range attraction is dealt with by counseling, while narrow-age-range attraction to minors is dealt with using libido-killing drugs; in America, any hint to anyone of attraction to minors will get you violently attacked, fired from your job, and generally foisted from society. They've accepted drugs, which is ludicrous, because drug dealers are selling poisons to children while these people are shrieking about people possibly harming their children.

We've convinced the masses that certain people with certain labels are monsters, and are standing right on the edge of the precipice, ready to dive into the witch hunt for anyone who vaguely looks like they may associate with the marked.

Comment Re:HP Paid silly money (Score 2) 53

Management estimates, not opinions. Management estimates have a risk attached to them, and it can be a really solid risk: you can have a 1% chance of hitting it big, or a 95% chance of taking market dominance; and you can predict this quite easily, if you know what you're doing.

In this case, HP and Oracle assert that they were looking at made-up bullshit, not management estimates: Autonomy was throwing out this ideal situation that had near-0% likelihood of occurring, and claiming it as the high-probability outcome.

Risk computations aren't opinions; they're solid, concrete, mathematical facts.

Comment Re:The Dangers of the World (Score 1) 784

You pretty much nailed why I don't have $25 million dollars right now: up at 4am, check foreign markets, check news, analyze stock graphs, analyze off-hours trading patterns, make predictions, place orders, place stop losses, check market all day, then spend the evening obsessing over the market and searching through sectors, funds, and individual stocks for good opportunities was a suicide mission. I'd have scaled one of the towers on Wall Street and jumped from the top before I got 2 years in.

I'll be out of debt soon. I don't need millions of dollars; I'll be filthy fucking rich when I have no debt. Those traders can all go suck cocks.

Comment Re:The Dangers of the World (Score 1) 784

Uh, negative on that, Jim. I used to make 1% per day in the stock market; I buy at good buy times and sell at good sell times. I currently don't trade because I don't care to lose money; if I'm not playing to win, I'm playing to fund someone else's golden toilet seat.

I know people whose accounts were halved and worse, and haven't recovered. Even if I invest in SCHD and JNK, I'll have to keep appraised of the market; it could easily go south, and then I'll have to just hold onto it--but it's easy for things to crash down and never recover, which is what happened to IndyMac Bancorp, THM, and a few others. Some of that money just went away.

This image tells a grand story: if you bought in at 1929, you were fucked; 1932, you were rich. 2000 was a bad year; 2003 was great. The DOW is nearly level with 2008. Both the DOW and S&P are showing extreme volatility; the line on the left, followed to the bottom of the second drop, is where the S&P should end up.

Buying in now is buying into a volatile market. Not great unless you have good reason to buy.

Comment Re:The Dangers of the World (Score 1) 784

You had good sense on investment. I was being told to buy in 2008, right before the bust, on a house I wouldn't be able to sell now because it's worth $50k less. I bought a house that I could pay off quick; in 2016, I'll have some $2200/mo less of expenses, which means I could go out and buy a brand-new Cintiq 2700QHD Touch every month and still have near $1000 left to spend, after paying all my bills.

I'll just max out my 401(K) and use that as a leverage source. When I take loans, it'll be at low rates, paying interest to myself.

My parents's reasoning was never sound in any context. They're the "I saw it on TV, Obama is putting us in concentration camps, we need to stock up on guns now" type.

Comment Re:The Dangers of the World (Score 1) 784

I've recognized that my parents's experiences are useless and largely discount them. They're as useful as dogma out of a random religious text or 1700s medical journal about how leeches solve all your problems. I've gained nothing from my parents's guidance.

You are in effect, claiming I'm taking advantage of my parents's experiences by ignoring my parents's experiences, which has the same effect as not being exposed to my parents at all. This is like saying I'm taking advantage of a suitcase full of money by walking past it (more like counterfeit money that will get you thrown in jail if you try to spend it).

Comment Re:time to buy futures, now. (Score 2) 441

The increased yearly capacity in US oil production since Bush's second term is, itself, bigger than the yearly capacity of all OPEC countries combined. The Keystone XL pipeline will vastly scale that up, dwarfing OPEC; but Keystone is now questionable, since oil needs to cost at least $80-$90/barrel for it to be profitable.

Comment Re:Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes (Score 1) 441

I just buy "Green" electricity. By contract, my energy supplier must produce at minimum as much solar energy as has been bought from them. If they have a 10MW solar installation and sell 8MW to customers, they're fine (the utilities buy the other 2MW off them as extra power); if they sell 12MW to customers, they need to buy 2MW more solar generation capacity.

I want a Solar-Wind-Geothermal-Nuclear option, but can't get it. Anything but the 13GW coal plant here (we have 11 coal power plants within 20 miles of my house, one of which is over 13,000 megawatts output).

Comment Re:time to buy futures, now. (Score 1) 441

Yeah but that's what happened. Everyone big in oil sold off their oil. 401(k) funds bought into it. Individual retail investors saw the price dip and, thinking they're savvy day traders, bought in. Now the big price crash comes, and the big players will buy back from the idiots who are crying about all the money they lost and toweling out.

That's how you take someone's money. Sell them expensive shit, then buy it back from them for half as much.

Slashdot Top Deals

Computer Science is merely the post-Turing decline in formal systems theory.

Working...