After a stream of viri made it past the dictionary lookuip and a low hit rate on new viri, I made a decision to not install anti-viris software on any newly built virt boxes.

To replace it, I added an execute permission restrictions policy, so that any thing a limited user downloaded or any file that resided in his/her directory/server file tree could NOT execute. 2nd, I hired a company called "spam experts" to filter incomming emails/ (primary infection path). Lastly and very important, setup a filter for any emails that remembered the old server IP address(open port 25) and bypassed spamexperts(MX reord) to be redirected into a offsite spam holding account.

Finally, added as much encryption as possible, TLS links between email clients and server, same goes for between email servers(TLS over port 25 comms)..

GMO's could be safe, but a significant portion are not. Thanks to our "for sale" highest bidder government, who allow substandard testing regimes to be accepted in the approval process.

Their is a world of misery headed our way thanks to these vested interests. The public is right to not trust these people. Is it any wonder why medical issues seam to be consuming ever more resources and funds look at the source, the food we eat.

I don't buy into the projected increasing amounts of coal usage. As the Chinese discovered, one pays a heavy price burning coal, (pollution of water, soil, air), and India will soon learn this lesson first hand.

Coal in the USA maybe a NOP by 2027, where coal generation peaked near 49% (2007), 33%(2015) and is still dropping like a rock 31% (April 2016).

As for the so called base-load argument, is a fool's argument, eventually we will need to use renewable's to provide more than 150% of our overall demand, using excess energy production to put Carbon back into the ground. Preferably in the form of Methane(CH4), which we can later tap to stabilize the grid when needed.

.

:First this conduct would be covered under federal jurisdiction and various bar associations.. I can think of number of different federal laws being broken, and the statute of limitations for conspiracy tolls from the last overt act. I.E. Yearly royalty payment to the patent troll.

Thus both this federal judge, his son and the principles of patent troll co could be in deep dodo..

Where Nest announcde they would brick a home automation hub they used to market.
And in order to save face, is offering a full refund

Yes, we in the USA are in fallout zone and got hit fairly hard.
Expect many more years of declining lifespan, unless you took steps to prevent inhaling and ingestion of various radio-isotopes from those meltdowns.
That's all for now, I don't want to start a flame war.

The exact opposite occurs, RF absorption in this case is based on physical dimensions.. A larger mass==worse, especially more than 40mm or more per dimensional vector. This also applies to hard radiation, smaller animals can tolerate higher radiation exposures, because much of radiation passes through tiny animals without impacting DNA, and other critical cellular functions.

As for 9 hours day for a 2 year old rat verses 1 hour a day fora human who has a lot more than 9x the lifespan.

As for low signal, that's a function fo the experimental animal's small mass in general, and a similar issue for brain size..

Perhaps males had larger physical bodies?. Thus the males would have absorbed more energy. (i.e. ~40mm cross section or larger,note: adj absorption for 1/2 wavelength, and velocity factor)..

I should point out a couple of factors that you missed.. First, 3E+8m/s is the speed of light/radio waves while traveling in a vacuum, traveling through flesh is somewhat slower, velocity factor 0.6 to 0.7, (shorter actual wavelength).. Second item, peak exposure across tissue is 1/2 wave length(peak to peak), thus peak exposure is down to 40mm range. which is way larger than an average 2 gram rat brain(reduced occurrence), no so for humans.

As we bring the cell phone in closer to our bodies, the received S/N ratio drops, (our body blocks the received signal), which in turn causes the phone to ramp up it's transmit power.

As for physical effects, I 've got a pair of slowly healing rf burns on my right inner thigh(10 years+). They are located where the two ends of my old moto cell phone antenna used to sit in my right pants pocket. That's more than enough evidence for me..

Procedure to reduce RF exposure, distance is your friend, keep your cell phone as far away from your body as possible. My cell phone resides in a outer pocked of a backpack, while I'm driving/biking/etc. At home it's a minimum of several meters away being charged up, bluetooth'd to my low power DECT cordless phones. P.S. The higher cell phone frequencies are some what more dangerous, and they have been in widespread use for the last 10 to 15 years.