Is that like when you try to typecast #OccupyResoluteDesk to "conservative", or do you have some other meaning in mind?

Shorter d_r: "It is better to whinge on about peripheral matters than face the reality that I have supported abject cretins."

I can get XBox games on my PC right now, for the most part. They're in Microsoft store, they're on Origin, et cetera.

I go to Steam because it's easy to find funky stuff and there's always a sale.

The XBox app won't change that.

I've shared the extend of what I know. If there was a deeper meaning to "Who?" I regret taking the question straightly.

Isn't that the point? After decades of listening to fools, Americans are (in aggregate) dumber than ever, despite spending more (per person) on education than pretty much everyone. Frivolity, hedonism, and permanent childhood are the new wisdom, morality, and maturity. Go, us!

For a quick glance at the Exec Summary, it looks like a fairly serious product.
I hope that it informs thoughtful discussion on the point. More training and gun ownership is better.

Wait until you have a kid. Windows L becomes VERY useful at home. Also good for curious hacker kitties.

Communism suddenly makes sense. Before you have replicators, well, not so much.....you need an end to scarcity to make communism work.

It's all they've got left. I wonder what will happen when the remaining 7 videos come out? Probably nothing, because without Planned Parenthood, Republicans would lose half the votes they have.

Well given that on his news website he says:

In fact if you go right to stallman.org it's current front and center at the top.

Time and time again I see news articles that seem to herald the idea that users are willing to sacrifice something like privacy for the use of software. Take Facebook for an example. You get a robust and snappy storage and website for communication at the cost of control over your life and privacy. And as I try to explain to people the tradeoffs most of them seem to be complacent. Even I myself use GMail, there's just no better mail service. Even if there were, I'd have to run the server from my home to be sure that I'm in control in it and it's truly free (by your definition). So given that much of the populace isn't even prepared technologically to harness truly free software, don't you think they have slowly accepted the trade offs and that the pros of your arguments -- though sound -- are only possibly realized by those skilled enough to edit source code or host their own mail server from their home?

I found your piece on selling free software to be pretty logical on paper. However, has it ever worked in the wild? Can you name companies or revenues that currently operate on this idea (and I'm not talking about services or support of the software)? I simply can't come up with a widely used monetized piece of software licensed under the GNU GPL whereby the original software was sold at a single price and shipped with the source code -- free for the original purchaser to distribute by the license's clauses. Can you list any revenue generation from that? I must admit I'm not exactly enamored with paying for free software (as in your definition of free) before it's written yet I cannot think of any other way this would fairly compensate the developer.

http://www.infowars.com/

Dude, the world is flat. The moon is Commie plot. Just ask Alex Jones.