Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The true enemy... (Score 1) 1706

Thanks, that data is somewhat more recent than what I previously had. I've used it to update my by-state US gun ownership and murder data. Conclusions:
  • Gun ownership and gun murder are uncorrelated or slightly inversely correlated.
  • Gun ownership is strongly inversely correlated with population density.
  • Murder rates are slightly correlated with population density, gun murder slightly moreso. (I'd guess the relation would be stronger if I did a by-county comparison instead of by state)
  • Gun ownership is weakly inversely correlated with overall murder rates.

Note, the gun ownership data is from 2001 - if someone can find something more recent, I'll update it.

Comment Re:The strange world of futurist (Score 4, Informative) 241

That's an excellent point - there seems to be a certain timeframe beyond which futurists fail to consider the implications of progressive implementation. On only slightly shorter timeframes, they can actually do quite well - for example, AT&T had a series of "You Will" ads in 1993 that were strangely accurate in predicting modern technology. Presumably it has something to do with extending an existing technology in a logical way rather than trying to determine the intermediate uses of new concepts.

Comment Re:Out of curiosity (Score 1) 339

Higher education degrees in the US for science and engineering degrees (not usually mathematics, I don't know about non-science technology degrees) are generally paid for by working as a TA or research assistant half-time. This usually waives or pays tuition and provides a moderate stipend, often funded via grant money or similar from the research group the student is working for. This is less common for Masters than it is for Doctorates, though.

Comment Re:There's no starship with just an ion drive (Score 1) 589

Unfortunately, constant high acceleration is energetically impossible. By the time you get to ~0.7c, you've used up half the mass of your ship if you have a perfectly efficient matter to kinetic energy converter (eg. a 100% efficient photon drive). I.E. your kinetic energy is now equal to your rest mass. Good luck getting anywhere near that with conventional propulsion methods!

Comment Re:anyone surprised? (Score 2) 478

I'll be voting for Ron Paul not because I agree with him on everything (although I agree with him on several things), but because I think it would be better to have a significant change, even if it includes crazy changes, rather than more of the same. It would be beneficial to shake up the current Federal government policies.

Slashdot Top Deals

Your files are now being encrypted and thrown into the bit bucket. EOF

Working...