Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Laptops? (Score 2) 125

Desktops work, but it's more of an IT support issue. My kids are doing Online School right now through the local school district. Chromebooks have been at the HS level for a while, but they hadn't gotten to elementary yet. Just imagine the level of IT support the teachers would need to have to support every home computer setup. I couldn't guarantee that the schools would supply hardware or not so I got them "desktops", monitors and keyboards running on VirtualBox through USB hardware. That allowed us to opt to receive the Chromebooks last to allow others who needed them the chance. However, they insisted on supplying the Chromebooks. They're in the end better. All the software works with how the schools have trained the teachers, and it's overall better. I'm sure the schools IT wouldn't want to try to troubleshoot any of my home equipment, and, frankly, I don't want them remoting into any of my devices.

Comment Unfortunate (Score 1) 170

They're pricing out people who don't want subscription services. I'd hope that this would kill the games that do this, but what is happening is there is a solid push to subscription games. If you want a game outside of the subscription then you'll have to pay a premium. If 60 bucks or less was your price point you're going to have to go to a subscription. Subscriptions will replace many of the cheaper options until buying cheap games will no longer be practical.

Comment Re:Does this seem like a bad idea to anyone else? (Score 3, Informative) 580

Sanity? The WHO was put in charge of fixing the issues that made SARS worse then it needed. China hid the issues with SARS, and this time the WHO helped them hide things until it was too late. No evidence of human to human transfer when Taiwan has given them that very information, but no upsetting China's feelings is totally worth letting a disease go unchecked. Most country's behavior with this has been due to that initial miss information that the WHO purposefully put out. Pull all the money out of the WHO and give it to the CDC. I'd sooner trust the CIA to tell us that a disease outbreak is happening in China, and to smuggle out the samples then I trust the WHO with one more dime.

Comment Re:So in all seriousness, what do we know? (Score 2, Informative) 95

If you say so. Everything I've read from a trustworthy source infection comes from bodily fluid. Perhaps you're confusing the respiratory symptoms with its infection vector.

Coronavirus Endoribonuclease Activity in Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Suppresses Type I and Type III Interferon Responses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

Comment Re:So in all seriousness, what do we know? (Score 1, Insightful) 95

Human to Human is a bit early to panic. It's only healthcare workers so far. Most news reports that it's a bodily fluid transmission, but I suspect from what I can see on reports on the family of viruses that it's probably transmitted via excrement/diarrhea. If it stays that way then only people in poor living conditions, or who are providing direct health care to infected individuals are at the most risk.

Comment Re:Correct Ruling (Score 2) 71

Not to rain on your "parade" but from the article.

The decision was based on studies provided by two court-appointed doctors that showed an increased risk of head tumours among those who talked on their phones for 30 minutes a day over a 10-year period.

Remember Italy was an Inquisition system up until not too long ago, and still has its finger prints. Judges and courts play a far more active role then they do in systems like the US.

Comment Re:Two questions (Score 1) 76

This is why my old job used Tape backups. Nothing short of magic is going to encrypt a tape after it's been backed up. Someone even encrypted a large portion of the shared network drive once. We were back up by the end of the day once we isolated the machine that did it. A little bit of data was lost from the morning, but no Raid, Mirror, or Real-Time backup would have stopped the encryption. Had they even got to the nightly backup there was the previous weeks tape in the safe if need be.

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: What happens when encryption breaks? 1

medv4380 writes: What would happen, or what should happen, if tomorrow a trivial method was discovered for Prime Factorization? By trivial I mean an Algorithm that runs in relatively constant time that could factor a number like 2737631357921793461914298938174501291 relatively instantly on most modern hardware today. And that even increasing the bit length wouldn't slow it down much. How much chaos would result if such a method were revealed tomorrow with little warning? But at the same time keeping it a secret only means that others may have long ago exploited the method at the expense of others. Should proof be presented without revealing the method to reduce the impact, and who should be told first if at all?

Comment Nothing New (Score 5, Interesting) 99

Banks used to have to process all the checks in the State that they received it in. It was a basic security measure before tech caught up, and it was meant to reduce the odds of a transaction going missing. The farther a check goes the more likely it is to get lost. I'm more concerned about my data being stored in a different country that opens it up to their laws and not the laws in which I live. Store the data in the US and I'm sure there are spooks all over it, and I'm just as certain that every country does that the moment they get the chance. A regime that wants my call metadata doesn't need access to the data center. They just tap into the infrastructure and capture it as it's transmitted. A government if far more capable of pulling off a MITM attack, but if the data is stored outside of a country of origin then that's one more government that has been added to my concerns. Zuck just wants his cut of the pie.

Comment Re:Oracle purchased a poorly managed technology, J (Score 1) 290

I believe they purchased Sun because they used Java for interacting with their Database, and the last thing they wanted was someone buying Sun and hitting them as they hit their customers. Once they had it they tried to do exactly what they thought others would have done had they got the asset. Had Sun been healthy I don't see Oracle being interested in it at all.

Slashdot Top Deals

God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner

Working...