OMG! They must have read your comment, realized the error of their ways, and done away with the fee!

"OS X Mavericks. Now available for free from the Mac App Store."
http://www.apple.com/osx/
https://itunes.apple.com/us/ap...

Quick -- ask for a pony next!

> I'd love to see a single UI that works across 4" phones and 7" tablets
> with gorilla glass, and 13" laptops and 10" convertibles with membrane
> keyboards, and 24" desktops with 101-keyboards, and 60" XBox Ones
> with controllers...

You want a UI on a 4" device with one low-res input -- your finger -- that's the same as what's on a 24" desktop with 100 keys and a pixel-accurate mouse because......... why?????

Go ahead and build from common core code -- worked for OS X/iOS! -- and make them work together and even have similar styles and icons, but optimize the UIs based on the environment. Different devices are different, and if you don't optimize for each, you get lowest-common-denominator crap. That is literally the definition of "optimize." Why wouldn't you optimize? There is no such thing as "optimized for all situations." Sinofsky's idea of No compromise design was complete and utter bullshit from Day 1 because design IS compromise. A good UI that's identical from 4" to 60" literally can not exist.

OK, fine, maybe it can exist and it's just that no one has invented it yet, but I'd bet my next year's pay that MS isn't going to solve that puzzle with Windows 9 or 10.

If you rent less than a movie a week (and if you can get by with a small catalog of current-ish releases), Redbox is pretty economical at $1.29 per DVD per day. You can't leave it sitting around your house for days at a time, but then you don't really need to because you get the movie when you want to see it (as opposed to requesting it on the site a day or two in advance) and then return it the next time you're out. There are redboxes everywhere in my area so getting to one isn't a big deal. In the 2 or 3 years years I've been using redbox, there have literally only been 2 or 3 times where I had to make a special trip to drop off a movie on time. Usually, I leave the house at some point during a day, and if I do, there's a redbox either where I'm going or on the way. (On the borders of my subdivision, there are redboxes at the Walgreens stores on the NW and SE corners, and one at the 7-11 on the NE corner. There's nothing on the SW corner, but I rarely go that way, and if I do, it's 1 mile to the next redbox.) My usual process is to get something on the way home from work and then drop it off when I go out the next day.

One thing in Redbox's favor is that the window between "hey, I want to see that" and having the movie in your hand can be just a matter of minutes. And if you do that, say, twice a month, that's $33/year instead of $96/year. So for small users -- like me -- it's actually faster and cheaper. (Plus they send codes by email or text for either a free rental, rent-one-get-one-free, or $.75 off a rental, about once every 3 weeks. I used redbox about once a month when I first signed up and I just rented when I had codes and I only paid for about 2 movies the first 6 months. Once I got used to using it, I started renting a little more.)

Get.
The.
Fuck.
Off.
Slashdot.

I haven't seen anything in the last 14 years to make me doubt any assertions in this article, which gives MANY reasons that micropayments won't work. Here's just one short section, but it's one of the key points.

http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2000/12/19/micropayments.html

> Capitalist theory says that if an incumbent merchant/provider
> is too inefficient to provide a good service or if another potential
> merchant/provider thinks they can do a better job for a lower
> price, then that new provider will step in and provide said service.

If the barrier to entry is too high, no one else can step in. Once a company is making huge monopoly profits, it can save a bit for a rainy day and undercut competitors until they go under. McDonald's could start selling burgers for 5 cents apiece until Burger King was bankrupt if it weren't for anti-monopoly laws.

The natural result of pure capitalism is monopolies. Regulation is required, because monopolies always wind up being bad for consumers.

Even moderately benign monopolies suck. Craigslist is a great example. Even though they are relatively benevolently run -- almost everything is free; a few things like real estate listings in major cities cost a lot and pay for everything else on the site -- their listings suck in a lot of ways and they have no incentive to make them better. Why can't they have columns for things like cars and computer so I can search specifically by Manufacturer -> Model, and not just to text searches on the ads? That would help deal with the fact that almost every ad in "cars for sale" looks like this. http://imgur.com/yOngDsE But because Craigslist has a monopoly, no other "stuff for sale" site can gain traction, and Craigslist has no reason to improve. So you eat the shit sandwich that is Craigslist because there's nothing else on the menu.

> This week, I got a real WTF when dealing with Microsoft products and
> the amazing amount of redundancy that is possible in the company.

I work with SharePoint and see this DAILY. When editing, one kind of page has a button that says "save" (which also ends the editing session); another kind of page has a button that says "stop editing" (which also saves.)

I imagine the boss talking to employees: "Coder #1: put a button that stops editing and saves on this kind of page. Coder #2: put a button that stops editing and saves on that kind of page."

SharePoint lists are also fun. If you go past 10k rows, bad things happen. But you can have as many columns as you want.
List 1: 3 columns, 11,000 rows, 33,000 total "cells" (for lack of a better term): BAD.
List 2: 25 columns, 9,000 rows, 225,000 total cells -- almost 7 times more -- EVERYTHING IS FINE.
(I've made lists like this just to test. It really happens.)

Again, I imagine one guy in charge of how rows are handled, and another in charge of how columns are handled.

> How does this make Microsoft better?

You always here that competition in the marketplace makes all companies stronger. So, maybe that? Kind of indirect, but it might work. The losers who stay behind will have to up their game to compete with their now-stronger competition.

Never thought I'd find myself searching google images for "thor nude", but here we are.

> Loki, however, will remain low-key.

Nice one. :-)

> When the police called off the chase (for other
> reasons) and he kept going at 100+mph...

Just to play devil's advocate here, it's not like they informed the guy via their loudspeakers that they were calling off the chase.

Old joke:
A white guy is driving through the South. He drives into two black guys. One is knocked across the street, the other pinwheels and crashes through the windshield into the car. The white guy gets out of the car just as a sheriff drives around the corner. He sees the wreck and gets out. The driver says "Oh my God, sheriff, this is so horrible." The sheriff says "Don't worry about it, I'll arrest these two." The driver says "I hit them -- why would you arrest them?" The sheriff points and says "This one, for breaking and entering, and that one, for leaving the scene of an accident."

I know some PHP so I wrote a reader that lives on my own server. It's very simple but it does exactly what I want it to. It has a problem with character encodings -- lots of things (curly quotes, em- and en-dashes) come in as '?'s -- but other than that, it's fine. Works for me.

Because in my circles, it's the smart people who don't trust the Internet.

I wonder what reason they'll use to justify pulling it back out of Windows 10?