None at all, but all that was in the summary was some marketing and a link to the site in question. Not exactly a decent setup for discussions. Even a minor review would have added at least some interest in what it was about (I'm not going to download something because someone random mentions it).
Did I miss something, or don't they even try to disguise advertisement on
It would appear that you are referring to "janteloven", it is a rather outdated, from 1933, view of (forced) equality.
...the sites were back up but that is largely because they didn't have anymore Raspberry Pis to sell.
People sure do buy some freaky stuff on the net. o_O
I can finally play GTA on my Apple computer? Awesome.
Even better, reduce copyright to, say, 14-20 years, then the content providers have to make the best selling ways available _now_ or miss sales.
Looks like Obama is wearing a tiny black wizard hat
Probably means "Rebecca Black - Friday".
Nah, it is part of car analogies often used on
So he just became a normal user as seen on Facebook, Twitter e.t.c.
CmdrTaco's tears can cure memory loss, unfortunately he never cries.
I'll ignore Google+, and I'll be pissed off if Google decides to automatically add it to Gmail.
It will happen. Just as Gmail got linked to YouTube accounts, and unless you use two browsers (or turn off cookies) it will be linked to your Google searches as well.
Google have some nice services and one login to tie them together makes it easy to use, but keep in mind that Google's main income is from advertising and data mining.
Oh man, at least add a spoiler alert when talking about the Space Invader film.
For 736c:6173:6864:6f74:2e6f:7267:: or similar to become available?
"Thanks to a federally-funded grant for magnet schools
Uhm, you probably shouldn't use devices with electronics or ferromagnetic materials in them there, just a heads up.
As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison
