Comment Re:BLINDED BY SCIENCE !! (Score 1) 315
No, that is not that you've been saying in this thread. Not at all.
Your previous post literally starts "There's no 'probably' about it", goes on to talk about understanding "what is and isn't possible", and ends with "you have to be able to pick the possible from the impossible".
Now you say, "Like I said, exceedingly unlikely"? Give me a break.
And if you have a "better bet" than something replicated by 3 independent teams, I'm sure NASA would be all ears. I really don't understand your strenuous objection to more testing to prove/disprove the effect. As I've said multiple times, even if there is a flaw in the testing there is scientific value in understanding failure. But you keep repeating your same argument without actually addressing any of these points, so we will have to agree to disagree.