Assuming you mean "orders of magnitude," you might want to familiarize yourself with what that actually means. 80 tonnes and 20 tonnes are not different by an order of magnitude. Not even one.
Also, the 80 tonne estimate seems to be from the distant past. More recent estimates are in the high 20s, so the difference with this estimate isn't even 50%.
Assuming you mean "orders of magnitude," you might want to familiarize yourself with what that actually means. 80 tonnes and 20 tonnes are not different by an order of magnitude. Not even one.
Also, the 80 tonne estimate seems to be from the distant past. More recent estimates are in the high 20s, so the difference with this estimate isn't even 50%.
Man, you are a dick... lol
If I would have fuckin meant orders of magnitude, I would have fuckin said it.
I didn't say it, cause "orders of magnitude" is incorrect, as you brilliantly
pointed out, after you changed the meaning of what I said by adding words.
magnitude [mægntjud] n.,
1. relative importance or significance
2. relative size or extent
3. (Mathematics) Maths a number assigned to a quantity, such as weight, and used as a basis of comparison for the measurement of similar quantities
Yes, when you add other words to a word and make a new phrase, it changes
the meaning sometimes. Maybe you should give up on that assuming part.
It doesn't work well for you.
I was further referring to things such as carbon sequestering, temperature and
humidity. Which, and I'm not gonna do the math, probably would be "orders of
magnitude" different when you consider it doesn't have to support the mass of
what was previously thought to exist as far as animals needing nutrients.
-AI
