Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Unfair comparison (Score 1) 447

I guess that you would consider therapeutic foot massage establishments unethical as well.

This seems like a pretty silly straw man to me. If the foot massage outfit is claiming to cure disease by rubbing your feet, then yes they should be shut down. If the foot massage outfit is just claiming to make your feet feel nice, then everyone's happy.

Comment Re:Unfair comparison (Score 1) 447

testing positive for X with a 90% accurate test does NOT mean you have a 90% chance of having X, unless X is so common that most people have it.

Yes thanks, we all know that. Doctors know that too. I believe that it would be covered in medical school. The average incidence of X is important too. If one out of ten people have X, then your 90% hit-rate test means that you have a 50/50 chance of having the deadly X. I think.

We've known dogs and rats can readily detect lung and many other cancers just by smelling a person's breath since at least the 50s (or was it 20s),- there's no profit in it.

What rubbish. There would be plenty of money in it, training dogs isn't cheap you know. Might be more difficult to train the rats though.

Comment Re:Unfair comparison (Score 2) 447

What I really don't get is why people reject the idea that the mind can heal.

They don't. The role of a healthy mind in the maintenance of a healthy body is fairly well understood by the medical community - which isn't to say that anyone really knows how it works, but doctors understand that happier people get better faster.

Why is it then that the role of the mind in healing is always denigrated as "placebo" (must be bad) instead of acknowledged as perfectly valid and important?

No-one, anywhere, is saying that the placebo effect is bad. What they are saying is that homeopathic remedies are no more effective than sugar pills. Which is perfectly true. It is, therefore, dishonest to sell homeopathic remedies and claim that they cure people.

You seem to be arguing against a position that does not exist.

Comment Re:What ever the boss says. (Score 2) 177

It will be alot faster in java though....

And it will be compiled, and (somewhat) typesafe (ok... but more so than python at least).

Which of course wasn't your point. But if your point is that your boss is an idiot and doesn't listen to technical direction from the knowledgeable people that he employs, then you simply need to get a different job.

Comment Bad review. Bad book. (Score 1) 44

In the book Lauren first learns how to draw a line and then that she can then draw and connect four of these to make a square.

Christ. Who writes this rubbish?

I read some of the book using Amazon's 'look inside' feature. It's deeply un-engaging, and highly unlikely to hold a child's attention for very long at all. Compare the writing in it to something that's actually good, and you'll hopefully understand what I mean.

Comment Re:It's not safe to ride listening to a book (Score 1) 304

I'm not sure that I completely agree - I listen to music on the way into work, and I've never even once found myself in a position when lack of audio clues put me in any danger.

As long as you use regular earbuds, and not the in-ear-silicon things that block out noise, then you'll be fine.

I do agree about audiobooks though, albeit for a different reason. You'll never be able to concentrate on them properly because you'll regularly have to concentrate too much on avoiding the idiot drivers. You'll just end up missing whole pages.

[Also rode to work for 15 years...]

Comment Data point of one... (Score 1) 261

A couple of years ago when I flew through the US everyone had an e-reader. The last time I flew, which was late last year, everyone had paper books. I notice that the bookstores in US airports still seem to be going strong - Amazon is still selling books hand over fist.

Sure, e-readers are great for storing millions of books (that you can't lend to your friends... dang it), but they just suck.

Comment Re:Not what it sounds like (Score 1) 398

I don't believe that's true. Quite a few people down a bottle of spirits and pass out and never wake up. It's probably next to impossible to kill yourself with beer purely through the acute toxicity of alcohol, but the same is not true of (say) vodka.

It's normally kids without sufficient experience to understand that although it's physically possible to drink an entire bottle of vodka in a few minutes, it's quite likely to end your life. The LD50 of ethanol translates to a little under half a litre of vodka (or gin, or whatever). That's not very much.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics

Working...