Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re: Force his hand..."Sue me! Sooner than later... (Score 1) 374

IOW, there are restrictions against taking commercial quality photos/videos at many/most sporting events, unless you pay or get permission.

There may be 'restrictions', and a sporting venue is presumably within their rights to throw you out of they feel like it, but has a restriction on the use of photographs taken at a sporting event and subsequently used for commercial gain ever been tested in court?

Comment: Re: You can't make this shit up. (Score 1) 774

When we stop belittling of half of earth's population down to the level of a bedroom/stove/pushchair accessory from their early teens

It starts earlier than that. Little girls are given pushchairs and toy food preparation equipment at the age of about three.

Comment: Re:A.I.? (Score 1) 402

But this does very much depend on what one might mean by "super intelligent". I don't think we're in danger of ever producing a human-like intelligence, but I don't think the AI-kills-us-all scenario really requires one. Just some robots that are "intelligent" enough to co-operate, fly around, recognise us from the air, and kill us.

They're already building them. I'm not certain I see it ending well.

Comment: Re:Our tastes calcify (Score 2) 360

by brantondaveperson (#49693575) Attached to: What Happens To Our Musical Taste As We Age?

don't have any buttload of free time anymore to go exploring new music.

There has literally never been any time in all of human history better for discovering new music than now. Bandcamp. Youtube. Soundcloud. And many others I'm sure I've never heard of. And it has never been easier to record and disseminate music than it is today.

Comment: Re:20s? (Score 1) 360

by brantondaveperson (#49693487) Attached to: What Happens To Our Musical Taste As We Age?

Mostly chart music is rubbish, sure. But there are always gems in there, and it's worth listening to for that reason.

Having it incessantly played in stores is another thing altogether though. That is annoying, and when Christmas rolls around it's next to impossible to stay in the store for ten minutes at a time.

Comment: Re:But... (Score 2) 244

It's easy to abuse the position of spending other people's money to support something as nebulous and subjective as art

No it isn't. It's extremely hard, and is fought for every time these things come up for review.

Personally I'd consider the world to be better off without much of modern art, by what right are my taxes spent on such things?

They used to say the same thing about Matisse. Or they would have, if grants had been around then. In any case, the amount of money spent on the arts is microscopic when compared against any other public spending. It's pretty cheap, and it's good for everybody.

Today though we've created the strange idea that an musician should be able to record their music once, and get paid for it repeatedly over the course of the next century

I have often thought the same thing. But if the company I worked for was not able to charge, over and over again, for the software that I write once, then the company would not exist, and I would be out of a job. There's nothing wrong with expecting payment for a copy of your performance. Not for a century thereafter, sure, but for a reasonable period of time. Twenty years seems reasonable.

Comment: Re:Someone is making decisions for me regarding th (Score 1) 386

To be honest, if your loop structure is that deep then you'd be better off refactoring the code into a function that performs the inner loop or loops. This is quite likely to make the code easier to read anyway. I've never written code with a triple-nested loop and found myself needing to break out of the inner loop, straight into to the outer loop. Perhaps I haven't lived :)

I guess it's a personal thing. I personally don't like goto, because it can go anywhere. Other people like it for exactly the same reason. So it goes.

Comment: Re:Someone is making decisions for me regarding th (Score 1) 386

Some cases I've used them for that I didn't feel dirty about are:
* checking for failure conditions from calls to sub-methods, and jumping to a common cleanup and exit code block. Difficult to replicate cleanly without massive if blocks, or abusing exceptions.

Or using C++...

* Cleanly breaking out of multiple nested loops

Tough one. I have to be honest, I've never used a goto in my code since I stopped writing BASIC, but I've sometimes missed this ability. Still, a language-level keyword like "breakall;" would be better than goto. Except insofar as it doesn't exist, and "goto" does...

* I've used them for an implementation of coroutines, which simulates threading for systems which don't have threads. In this case the GOTOs were nested inside macros and stub classes for holding context, but the whole scheme wouldn't have worked without them.

Sounds clever. I hate macros even more than goto, so I expect seeing the code would send me into anaphylactic shock.

Comment: Re:It not very hard (Score 2) 167

by brantondaveperson (#49669795) Attached to: How Spotify Can Become Profitable

That's not completely true. Millions of people around the world paying small amounts of money for iOS apps shows that it can be done. Additionally, I signed up for a $1.29/month charge for an extra 20G of iCloud storage, and it was extremely easy.

If Apple can figure it out, why can't spotify? Or is the 'enter your credit card' details step the part that you indirectly refer to as difficult? If so, then sure, there's no easy way of charging people a small amount of money without requiring and storing credit card details. If you can get people's credit card details, then what's the problem?

Of course, once you've launched a free service - and rightly or wrongly people really do expect free stuff - it's rather hard to convert that into a 'pay' service without losing a large percentage of your user base.

E = MC ** 2 +- 3db

Working...